My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/27/1981 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1981
>
07/27/1981 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 1:09:20 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:47:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/27/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />., <br /> M I NUT E S <br />. Eugene City Council <br /> City Council Chamber <br /> July 27, 1981 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> COUNCILORS PRESENT: Gretchen Miller, Brian Obie, Betty Smith, Mark Lindberg, <br /> D. W. Hamel, Eric Haws, Cynthia Wooten, and Emily Schue. <br /> Adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon, was called <br /> to order by His Honor Mayor Gus Keller. <br /> I. PUBLI C HEAR I NGS <br /> A. Parade Permit Ordinance and Administrative Rules Revision (memo, <br /> ordinance and administrative rules distributed) <br /> Micheal Gleason, City Manager, introduced Tim Sercombe, City Attorney. <br /> Mr. Sercombe stated that in fall 1979, the parade permit ordinance was revised <br /> to make it constitutional. Since that time, the Oregon ACLU hired local <br /> attorneys to review the ordinance and to take action to remedy any perceived <br />. constitutional deficiencies during the current re-examination of the Parade <br /> Permit Ordinance. Also, the local chapter of the National Lawyers' Guild has <br /> studied the ordinance and requested various changes. Staff has met with these <br /> groups and discussed the legal principles which limit the City's discretion in <br /> this area. On the basis of staff research, staff suggests the following guide- <br /> lines to govern issuing, denying, and revoking parade permits: 1) any time <br /> discretion is vested in an official to issue, deny, or revoke parade permits, <br /> specific and definite criteria must be used to make the decision; 2) restrictions <br /> or preconditions regarding permit issuance must not be so onerous or impossible <br /> as to amount to a prior restraint on speech; and 3) the law is clear that a <br /> threat or potential of violence from spectators is insufficient reason to deny a <br /> permit . This is based on the Skokie, Illinois, Nazi demonstrations when the <br /> courts held that the Nazis could not be denied a permit solely because of the <br /> fears about violent spectators; however, intended or actual violence by the <br /> parade participants is a sufficient reason to deny or revoke a permit if those <br /> criteria are in the ordinance. The following changes will take care of most of <br /> the identified constitutional defects: <br /> 1. Section 5.500--Definition of a Parade: The current ordinance defines <br /> a parade as "a gathering of at least ten persons who travel more than <br /> 100 feet on City property for a common purpose" and it waul d be <br /> ,changed to "for a common purpose of public demonstration." This would <br /> remove gatherings that do not have any problems with attracting <br /> spectators, crowd control, or traffic, from the ordinance. <br />. <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 27, 1981 Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.