Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> the top three listed on the bar poll necessarily, but perhaps the poll's results <br /> could be taken as advisory. He feels the bar should pay for the poll if they <br /> e want one done and provide the information to the council. <br /> Ms. Schue asked when the current contract expiration date is. Ms. Miller <br /> explained that the contract expired June 30, 1981. Ms. Schue agreed that more <br /> oversight would be good. She suggested forming a subcommittee. <br /> Mr. Hamel stated that six-and-one-half years ago, the council went through this <br /> when Councilor Bradley brought it up. Judge Bocci has been in that position <br /> for a long time, and much inflation has occurred. Any judgment should be based <br /> on his performance, not his salary. He has heard nothing derogatory about the <br /> current judge. He stated that he is not in a position to make that judgment. <br /> He suggested leaving the process as it is for now, but feels the circumstances <br /> could be changed. <br /> Mr. Obie stated that Ms. Miller has been working on this very hard and there is <br /> sufficient variance of opinion to warrant another subcommittee. He is not com- <br /> fortable with the bar poll. He has a concern that this would become a popu- <br /> larity poll. He believes Ms. Miller's review and her arguments are good. He <br /> asked if others in the judicial system could be included for the review process. <br /> He would prefer that the current contract be renewed and work be done on the <br /> ordinance. According to what he has heard, these concerns are not being done in <br /> criticism of the current job being done; but if they are, that should be brought <br /> up as well. <br /> Ms. Wooten stated this is not a reflection on the current judge, but she does <br /> e agree with Ms. Miller and will not support renewal of the contract until this is <br /> done. Ms. Schue indicated agreement, and said it could be accomplished within a <br /> month. The council is talking about a system, not a person. She would support <br /> this being done before consideration of renewal of the contract. Ms. Miller has <br /> been working on this for over a year. She would like to see the item brought <br /> back after review. Ms. Miller indicated agreement that it could be done in a <br /> month. Last year's contract was not signed until December. Mr. Haws noted <br /> that previously, there was a judicial committee consisting of Mr. Haws, Mr. <br /> Hamel, lawyers, and citizens. <br /> Keith Martin, City Attorney, stated that the contract would remain in effect <br /> until it is changed. Ms. Smith noted it would be helpful to have an attorney <br /> from the outside on the committee. Mr. Haws indicated he would be willing to <br /> let Ms. Miller serve in his place this time. Mr. Gleason stated he is not sure <br /> that citizens should be on the committee. <br /> Mayor Keller suggested that a subcommittee consisting of himself, Ms. Miller, <br /> and Mr. Obie be formed. He would like to bring this item back in four weeks. <br /> Council agreed. <br /> v. CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 (memos distributed) <br /> Mr. Gleason introduced Warren Wong, Management Services. <br /> e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 9 <br />