Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> - ~ <br />. <br /> pedestrians. He added that due to the narrow size of the alley and the presence <br />. of two-way traffic on it, there were frequent encroachments on private property. <br /> Mr. Croteau said that the Eugene Planning Commission had unanimously recommended <br /> approval of the vacation. <br /> Councilor Miller explained that she had previously had extensive ex parte <br /> contacts on this matter, since she had lived on Tax Lot 100 and had been aware <br /> of the long history of concern over use of the alley. She said, however, that <br /> she had had no substantive contacts on this particular application. She did not <br /> feel that she had any conflict of interest, nor was she predisposed toward any <br /> particular solution to the problem. She said she therefore felt comfortable <br /> participating in discussion and voting on the item. Ms. Miller said that <br /> it would be helpful to have additional ;~formation on the degree to which <br /> the alley is currently used by persons wishing to drive south through the valley <br /> to Interstate 5 and of any possible alternative routes. <br /> Public hearing was opened. <br /> Judith Lindsay, 1985 Riverview, spoke for.herself as applicant and for her <br /> nelghbors Tom and Gloria Thetford and Betty Jones. She explained that this <br /> issue had been discussed for ten years. She gave some background of the history <br /> of deeds and easements in the area and of the City's acquisition of Tax Lot 1299 <br /> and of the dedicated portion of the alley. She explained that, contrary to Mr. <br /> Croteau's statement, only half of Lot 1299 is a dedicated roadway. Ms. Lindsay <br /> said that the alley is narrow and steep, with a ten percent grade. She said <br /> that the alley cannot be widened without moving houses. She was concerned about <br /> the large amount of dust raised by traffic on the alley and by daily encroachment <br />. of alley users onto adjoining private property. She stated that in 1979, the <br /> Laurel Hill Neighborhood Association had voted to relinquish its interest in the <br /> City-owned lot. <br /> Allen Gray, 2035 Riverview, referred to the alley in question as "20th Avenuell <br /> and said that it was the only east-west connection from Riverview to Augusta, <br /> between 16th and 26th avenues. He noted that despite the fact that the Transpor- <br /> tation Improvement Plan called for preserving east-west connections in the <br /> valley, two such connecting streets had recently been closed. Mr. Gray opposed <br /> this vacation unless some other east-west street were opened in its place. <br /> Don McCloud, 2151 Riverview, clarified the stand taken by the Laurel Hill <br /> Neighborhood Association on this issue in 1979. He said the neighborhood's <br /> stand had been that if the City vacated the alley, the neighborhood association <br /> asked that an easement for pedestrians and bicycles be given. Mr. McCloud said <br /> that he is a member of the Laurel Hill Refinement Plan Update Team and that 12 <br /> of the 13 members of that team contacted had agreed to urge the council to table <br /> consideration of this item until the update is completed. He said that transpor- <br /> tation considerations playa major role in the update and that the planning team <br /> might well have recommend at ions on the future of "20th Avenue. II <br /> William Schwall, 2260 Riverview, said he felt it was a good idea to return the <br /> land 1n quest10n to the tax rolls, but he urged the council to postpone making a <br /> decision until the transportation needs of the valley are examined by the <br /> Refinement Plan Update Team. <br />. ( <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 9, 1981 Page 7 <br />