Laserfiche WebLink
Majeska Seese-Green, PO Box 1214, speaking on behalf of the Whiteaker Community Council, conveyed <br />the community council's recommendation to form an independent external police review process. She was <br />pleased to see that it was the fourth recommendation in the report. She expressed the Whiteaker council's <br />support for the first and third recommendations, regarding the development of mechanisms to access more <br />segments of the community and the determination of community expectations of the police department <br />respectively. She stated that the Whiteaker Community Council, together with the Police Commission, <br />planned to co-sponsor a discussion of the report and also of the progress on the independent police review at <br />7 p.m. on June 1. <br /> <br />Speaking for herself, Ms. Seese-Green urged implementation of nearly all of the recommendations. She <br />appreciated that the report was done and expressed hope that the community would get its "money's worth" <br />out of it. <br /> <br />Tim Laue, 124 Spencers Crest Drive, thanked the council for the opportunity to address the issue. He said <br />the Police Commission had sent a memorandum regarding its recommendations on the report. He noted the <br />City Manager said the report had provided a "road map" for addressing some of the most critical hiring, <br />training, and management practices that were at issue in the organization of the EPD. He stated that while <br />the commission acknowledged that ultimately successful implementation of the report would require <br />significant resources and leadership from the City and the council, the commissioners were hopeful that <br />through such a commitment, police services to the community could be enhanced and the complaint system <br />could be redesigned to provide accountability and increased transparency. He averred that this would <br />ultimately yield the changes that would in turn generate trust and confidence in the EPD. He said this would <br />prevent the reoccurrence of the type of activities that brought about the report in the first place. <br /> <br />Mr. Laue averred that social scientists had understood for decades that in trying to build a better <br />community, people were unwilling to cooperate with people they do not know and unwilling to trust people <br />they had not met. He asserted that in order to reestablish the mutual trust and support necessary for the <br />community to get past the crisis and to diminish the isolation that separated and divided people, people <br />needed to reintroduce themselves to one another and acknowledge the mistakes made and address the <br />attitudes and practices that allowed such mistakes to be made in the first place. He felt that no report and no <br />amount of money could accomplish this. He said this result could only happen if the community found <br />common ground and worked together to serve the community that the residents loved. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing and called for comments from the City Council. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 appreciated Police Commission Chair Laue's contribution to the hearing as well as the <br />substantive report provided to the council by the commission. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Pap6, City Manager Taylor stated that input and recommendations <br />had been encouraged from all citizens and the Human Rights Commission and Police Commission. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz thanked everyone for testifying, particularly those for whom it took great courage to speak. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly noted that the Police Commission memorandum made the point that it was the initial <br />reaction to the report and not the final analysis of it. He underscored that the Police Commission would be <br />providing further input regarding the results of the review. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 25, 2005 Page 4 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />