Laserfiche WebLink
for square footage. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor concurred with all that had been said about construction. He said, regarding demolition debris, <br />every ton of material cost $45 and if half of the material was recycled it saved that money. He pointed out <br />components of the meeting room that could be recycled and resold, which would actually make money for <br />tax payers. He felt benefits could be reaped from both demolition and construction. <br /> <br />Mr. Penwell reiterated that 95 percent of the demolition material from the old Chiquita site had been reused <br />or recycled. He thought the City Hall building could easily be recycled should it be razed. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling agreed with Mr. Pap& He had some of the same questions that Mr. Kelly had regarding the <br />certification versus equivalency and the cost benefits. He was particularly interested in the recycling of <br />demolition material as it benefited both the environment and the City taxpayers' pocketbooks. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said it was great to have an opportunity at a work session to show the public the work the <br />City was doing. She shared her excitement at the responses of the people around the table and stated that <br />she looked forward to taking the opportunity to move forward on this. She encouraged the council to take <br />both the long view and the short view and move forward as possible with real ~vigor and aim." <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the work session at 1:28 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Dennis M. Taylor <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Ruth Atcherson) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 27, 2005 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />