My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 05/11/05 WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 05/11/05 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:28:33 AM
Creation date
6/15/2005 12:04:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Work Session <br /> McNutt Room--City Hall <br /> <br /> May 11, 2005 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: George Poling, Jennifer Solomon, Betty Taylor, David Kelly, Gary Papd, <br /> Bonny Bettman, Andrea Ortiz, Chris Pryor. <br /> <br />Mayor Kitty Piercy convened the work session of the Eugene City Council. <br /> <br />A. ACTION: <br /> Resolution 4834; A Resolution to Approve the Eugene-Springfield Five Year Consolidated <br /> Plan for Housing and Community Development for Submission to the Federal Department of <br /> Housing and Urban Development <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy explained that this was a continuation of a Consent Calendar item at the previous meeting, <br />held on May 9. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor noted that the motion was already on the table. He said Linda Dawson, Grants <br />Manager for the Planning and Development Department (PDD), was available to answer questions. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman thanked staff for refining the language. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Kelly, moved to delete references in the plan regarding the <br /> City of Eugene's funding of street, alley, and traffic signal improvements in eligible <br /> neighborhoods on Table 2B, in the text and in the stated objectives unless the infrastructure <br /> improvements were located contiguous with a publicly subsidized low- or very low-income <br /> housing development. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman averred that money slated for the alleviation of poverty and homelessness would be spent on <br />projects that were not a high priority because of generally permissive language in the Consolidated Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly appreciated the fine tuning of the language that allowed infrastructure improvements in <br />combination with a housing project. He pointed out that this plan was part of the Community Development <br />Block Grant (CDBG) process. He said historically the majority of the money had been spent to help various <br />social service agencies and requests always outweighed funding capacity. While he believed there was a <br />need for traffic calming and signalization, he did not think CDBG money was the ~appropriate pot." <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor disagreed. She thought that low-income people had a legitimate need for things aside from <br />housing. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 11, 2005 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.