My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 05/11/05 WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 05/11/05 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:28:33 AM
Creation date
6/15/2005 12:04:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Kelly underscored that the City Council should be able to vote on whether to sign off on the project. He <br />recognized the challenges of gathering the Joint Elected Officials and suggested that each body meet <br />separately. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly expressed frustration that the project had been divided into two segments. He hoped the <br />legislature could be convinced to change the OTIA rules so that both the ramp and the bridge could be <br />constructed and some savings realized. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman reiterated her objection to allowing the SEL, MPC, or MPO make the final decision. She <br />asserted again that the City Council should have the final say. Mr. Boyatt responded that the Eugene City <br />Council absolutely had the power to make a yay or nay vote and direct its representative to relay its <br />decision. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman wanted the process to be delineated ahead of time so that the representative would not have <br />veto power and potentially circumvent the will of the council. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly pointed out that when a TransPlan amendment was needed all three elected bodies had to sign off <br />so it would not make sense to proceed with the foreknowledge that one elected body would object. He hoped <br />that ODOT would get back to all three jurisdictions and the State to indicate that the City of Eugene would <br />agree to Phase 2 but wanted to specify that its decision authority would be the council. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 1:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Dennis M. Taylor <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Ruth Atcherson) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 11, 2005 Page 10 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.