Laserfiche WebLink
families in the neighborhood and a number of neighbors outside of the CNR area. He shared that one <br />member, an architect, convened a %oot camp" that taught participants about setbacks, roof slopes, and <br />building mass among others, and that members walked the neighborhood, recording detailed information on <br />how lots had been developed. He felt that without this work, there would not have been the database on <br />which to present the group's proposals. He thought CAFHN had provided a remarkable opportunity for <br />people to learn about issues and to have a real say on what the ultimate proposals were. He asserted that <br />without this process, the public meetings would not have been enough. He cited the April 14 design review <br />meeting at which 50 slides were shown in two hours with little time for neighbors to ask questions. He <br />hoped the council would encourage the project team to ;;have the appropriate regard" for the work done and <br />the concerns the neighbors still had. <br /> <br />Sharon Sherman, 1129 Taylor Court, said she was one of Eugene's original ;;infill pioneers," as she and <br />her husband moved into a modest bungalow that had been moved from its original location to a vacant lot <br />the City had landbanked on an alley. She showed an article from The Register-Guard that covered the <br />story, dated from 1979, that talked about how the City and the Westside Neighborhood Association were <br />working together to promote houses being placed on vacant lots in the neighborhood and sold to owner- <br />occupants. She related that the emphasis on owner-occupied residents was to stabilize the highly transient <br />rental neighborhood. She asserted the planners had lost touch with this idea and through zoning changes the <br />neighborhood had burgeoned with cheap apartments without concern for the impact on adjacent home- <br />owners or neighborhood stability. She called her block the ;;poster child" for destructive and destabilizing <br />infill. She said the City invited area residents to participate in a process that would result in infill standards <br />to protect the health of the neighborhood. She alleged that because the project ran out of time, a crucial <br />standard to limit building height and mass had not been addressed and 35- to 40-foot buildings would <br />continue to be allowed. She asked the council to encourage the CNR team to extend its collaboration with <br />CAFHN and address this remaining issue. <br /> <br />Paul Cont,, 1461 West l0th Avenue, said he was a member of the CAFHN steering committee. He thanked <br />the staff and consultants who had worked on the project. He averred that two problems that arose in late <br />March and April had jeopardized the project, which he deemed %nce on its way to success." He said staff <br />and consultant resources were underestimated and that building height and mass standards had not been <br />completed. He alleged the ;;deficiencies" in the standards did not reflect the well-documented neighborhood <br />character. This caused 18 of the 20 people present to sign a letter in opposition to the standards, which was <br />then submitted to the project team. He asserted the team appeared to be no longer using the neighborhood's <br />character as the basis for some of the standards. He said the group was told height standards for the <br />neighborhood could not be stricter than R-1 and infill standards for the neighborhood had to be generic <br />enough to fit mixed use nodes throughout the City. He called this a major reversal in how the project had <br />been presented to the residents. He thought it made no sense to have standards that sought to protect the <br />character of a neighborhood unless the standards were based on a ;;well-researched identification of the <br />characteristics specific to that neighborhood." He asserted the project was moving ahead with a proposal <br />that had strong public opposition to major elements and that did not fulfill the purpose of the project, which <br />sought to develop infill standards. He declared the project to be sliding back to the %ne-size-fits-all" <br />approach to nodal development that the council specifically rejected. He said CAFHN proposed a solution <br />to the PDD Director that would have the Planning Commission consider whether infill standards should be <br />based on the character of the neighborhood to which they apply or whether such standards should be <br />generic. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 9, 2005 Page 4 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />