Laserfiche WebLink
Don McElroy, 120 West 30th Avenue, explained that he had owned a house in the West University <br />neighborhood for 20 years and that he looked forward to alley improvements. He related that he had read an <br />article in The Register-Guard the previous weekend that included the amount of money the alley project <br />could cost, and it had given him pause. He asked that the City make sure to educate everyone regarding the <br />costs. <br /> <br />David Monk, 3720 Emerald Street, stated that he was an applicant for the Lane Regional Air Pollution <br />Authority (LRAPA). He opined that while he might not be the most qualified candidate, he spent more time <br />with the board than any other candidate. He felt there was great value in the work of the LRAPA. He <br />averred the local airshed was not well-addressed by the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) <br />because the department offices were located in Portland and officials were less familiar with it. He said City <br />Attorney Glenn Klein indicated in a 2003 legal opinion that when the at-large position on the LRAPA board <br />would expire in March 2005, the Eugene representative must take that position. He believed that the Oregon <br />Revised Statute (ORS) 468A(120) was clear in this regard as it specified that an at-large member was only <br />a participant if the board did not have five members or if there was an even number serving on the board. <br />He encouraged the council to direct the City Manager Dennis Taylor to solicit an expedited opinion from <br />legal counsel for LRAPA's board to retain one at-large board member and appoint a second one at a time <br />when Eugene would seat its new representative. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the Public Forum and opened the floor for councilor comments and questions. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 thanked those who testified. He wished to compliment in particular the work of the group <br />CAFHN. He commended their testimony and their research and materials, adding that the latter was very <br />thorough. He asked the City Manager if the council would be working out a process and whether it was <br />getting too far ahead of the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor reported that he had conferred with Interim Director of Planning and Development <br />Susan Muir and members of the neighborhood. He said Ms. Muir was working on the issue and would be <br />responding to their concerns, specifically what kind of proposal would be made to the Planning Commission <br />and how the options could be furthered refined. He offered to provide a written response from Ms. Muir to <br />address the concerns regarding building height and mass. Councilor Pap6 responded that he hoped the <br />planning would be fully vetted prior to coming before the Planning Commission and ultimately the City <br />Council. City Manager Taylor called it an important conversation to have with all neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 expressed appreciation for the testimony from the firefighters. He clarified that Station 9 <br />was staffed at 75 percent but did not have an engine company. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ observed that the Santa Clara park issue had brought the community together. He thanked <br />the SCCSPOS members for their testimony. <br /> <br />Continuing, Councilor Pap~ asked the City Manager to respond to testimony about the draft PROS plan and <br />potential involvement of SDC money. City Manager Taylor replied that the draft plan was a proposal from <br />the Mayor's committee that was working its way toward council consideration and adoption and/or <br />modification. He did not believe that the proposal involved SDCs. Councilor Pap~ related that he had been <br />contacted by some concerned citizens whose property had been listed in the plan. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 9, 2005 Page 6 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />