My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Police Auditor Report
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 11/13/06 Work Session
>
Item B: Police Auditor Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:15:22 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 10:16:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />20. ConfIdentiality <br /> <br />To the extent permitted by the Oregon Public Records law, the Auditor's Offlceand any investigators or. ,r--' <br />consultants it may empfoy, and members of the eMlian Review Board shall maintain the confidentiality of W <br />r~~ds and inform?tion in a~rdance with apfllcable federal, state and local law and other applicable city ,- <br />policies and collective bargaining agree.ments . <br /> <br />21. Limitations of Power . <br /> <br />. a) The Chief of Police shall make all case adjudication and employee discipline decisions. The police <br />auditor may develop adjudication reCQmmendations, but is not authorized to recommend the level of <br />discipline for police employees. <br /> <br />b) The Civilian Review Board, or .any member thereof", may not: <br /> <br />i. investig.ate complaints or incidents involving police et:n'ployees; <br />ii. issue subpoenas or call witnesses; <br />iii. review employee discipline decisions except,in the cOntext of reviewing trend reports from the <br />Auditor's Office consistent with section 8 (d).3~ of this chapter; <br />iv. incur city expenses or obligate the city in any way. without prior authorization of the police auditor <br />or City CQuRcil. <br /> <br />') <br /> <br />6 There was a question as to whether "applicable city po'licies" was overly vague and how existing or new contract language would b~ <br />applied to the ordinance. . <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.