Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. One of the first team tasks was to develop a statement of work to gUide the group's work and to <br />identify a set of commonly agreed to program outcomes to strive for, as follows: . . <br /> <br />MATT is comprised of community members and city staff whose goal is to ensure that <br />alternative dispute resolution is a vital component of the redesigned police complaint system. <br />In doing this work, the team recognizes the creativity and dedication put forth to establish the <br />current complaint mediation program. The intent of MATT members is to re-evaluate the <br />existing program and review other mediation programs in place nationally to develop. <br />recommendations that will expand access to and use of alternative methods of resolving. <br />complaints,against police employees. Ultimately, the team's efforts will result in a modernized <br />mediation and.advocacY system that is recognized nationally and embraced locally. <br /> <br />A police complaint mediation program provides the opportunity for participants to air their <br />differences, explain perspectives, and feel heard in an environment that is safe, impartial and <br />confidential. In, doing so, both parties are able to develop an appreciation of the other <br />. person's experiences and to better understand ,other perspectives of the incident. Mediation is <br />, a fair and equitable process that encourages . pa~icipants to be accountable for thei'r own <br />behavior. . It provides a positive approach .toconflict resolution, creating the potential for a <br />' win-win situation, thereby improvingsatisfa,ction in the complaint process for all involved. <br /> <br />In looking at design options for the ~ediation program, MAlT believes the ,sy~tem should: <br /> <br />identify complaints that are well. suited for alternative resolution options as well a's those <br />that are not appropriate for alternative resolution; <br /> <br />carefully select cases for alternative resolution to help build credibility in the system to <br />optimize program utilization in the future; <br /> <br />have formalized, consistent operating procedures that are easily explained. to participants; <br /> <br />present an expeditious, resource-efficient complaint resolution option; <br /> <br />- work in coordination with Internal Affairs, Human Rights Support System and the Au'ditors <br />Office processes to achieve high visibility and easy access for the public; <br /> <br />clearly define a process for resolution and closure of a complaint; <br /> <br />include thorough case tracking and program evaluation capabilities; and <br /> <br />- translate issues arising from individual c;omplaints into broader trends that can be used to <br />iQentify possible improvements to deRartmentaI policy,. training ,and practices, ultimately <br />helping to improve the relationship between the police and community. . <br /> <br />Using the program outcomes as a guide, MATT discussed the strengths and challenges in the city's <br />existing mediation and advocacy program, identifying key issues for discussion. Where there was <br />consensus, the team crafted recommendations to optimize the use of alternative methods to resolve <br />police complaints. In compiling this' information, MAlT's intent was to develop a framework for future <br />program design, acknowledging that some issues would be left unresolved pending the <br />.implementation of the new civilian oversight system. Many of the r~commendations formalize current <br />practices or clarify procedures for improved consistency. Recommendations for change often reflect <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />r.'-.... <br />.t...' <br />\---J <br />