Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br /> <br />a citation or arrest, court proceedings involving the complainant and officer are pending. In these <br />situations, it was recommended that the mediation either be postponed until the <br />. adjudication/disposition of the. case or, if that wOlJld pose an undue delay, that mediation not be <br />considered. . <br /> <br />Cases where racially-biased policing/disparate treatmentis alleged are very difficult to prove through <br />the internal affairs investigatory process, and the underlying issues that led to the complaint often go <br />unresolved. Misunderstandings and communication failures frequently contribute to perCeptions of <br />. biased treatment. Because mediation offers the potential for both ' parties to gain better <br />understanding and appreciation for the other persons' perspectives through a constructive discussion <br />of these sensitive issues, MATT recommended that, whenever feasible, these allegations are included <br />in the pool.of eligible cases. <br /> <br />Mediation can be a powerful teaching tool and learning experience for both parties and in this way, is <br />a form of accountability. For this reason, and consistent with the philosophy of inclusiveness, it was <br />recommended that employee complaint hi~tory be a consideration for .determining eligibility, but not <br />automatically form the basis for categorical exclusion of that case. Similarly, the likelihood' that a <br />case would . result in a "sustained" adjudication should not preclude mediation in all situations. If the <br />auditor,. in consultation with Internal Affairs and the employee's supervisor, believes that mediation <br />will have a more positive il11pact on officer conduct than the disciplinary process and would be in the <br />best interest of the other party(ies) involved, then mediation should be given consideration. . <br /> <br />// <br /> <br />l. ) <br /> <br />. 'MATT discussed whether employee-:-on-employ~e complaints should b~ eligible for mediation. While <br />mediation of internally generated complaints may be an appropriate option in' certain cases, other <br />avenues are available for city employees to resolve conflicts, such as the Employee Assistance <br />Program.'. It was therefore recommended that this not be incorporated into the complaint mediation <br />program at .this time. However, MATT agreed that an officer who is having difficulties with a <br />community member that s/he will likely have continued/on-going interactions 'with may request <br />mediation to help resolve those issues. <br /> <br />.:. Participation and Agreements <br /> <br />One of MATT's objectives was to clarify and formalize procedures so that they ~eflect best practices <br />and are consistently interpreted and applied. The following procedural clarifications are <br />recommended :' <br /> <br />o A signed "agreement to mediate" form, that includes standard language reg~rding confidentiality <br />and other procedural expectations, should be required for all participants in a mediation, including <br />the mediator. . <br /> <br />o A resolution agreement between the parties should not be required as ~n outcome. An optional <br />written agreement may. be developed by the" participants to document the outcome of the <br />mediation and any additional actions to be taken by the involved parties as a result of the <br /> <br />1 An issue of how to handle.disclosure of new allegations during a mediation that are serious in nature. was discuss~d at the <br />April Police Commission meeting. This issue is flagged for possible inclusion in the agreement to mediate form, as the <br />ability for the mediator to suspend a session for this reason, or because the ~ession is not progressing, may be a valuable <br />inclusion. <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />