Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- Patricia Thomas,- AlA <br />June' 8, 2006 <br />Page 2. <br /> <br />co~munity life. Goal findings were made on all applicable . Statewide- <br />Goals and 'the Downtown Plan, including the specific policies that <br />called for ,redesign'ation of particular'parcels c~nsistent with the <br />· ,Statewide Goals. The issue now- is only the mechanic~ of change in <br />the. diagram to. comply with what .the adopters of the refinement plan <br />found t6 be consistent with the 'Statewide Goals. If there was to be a <br />challenge to the,appropriatenes's' of,those designations called for in ,the <br />new DowntoWn Plan; it could'only be timely made when the refinement <br />plan was a,dopted. <br /> <br />My point in stressing the fact that the refinement plan adopted <br />addresses the entire plan 'area, so that analysis for individual sites is <br />not appropriate, is borne out by many' of the findings adopted with the <br />Downtown Plan. An example i,s GoallO-Housing. The findings 'state <br />. that: ' <br /> <br />"The Downtown Plan specifically encourages a variety of <br />, housing and home ownership opportunities in the <br />downtown core and: qn the edg~s, of the Downtown 'Plan <br />area., T~e ,Pl~n supports the strategjc. use of financial <br />tools to assist housing ,development, in these loc'ations., <br />The Plan does not reduce or increase the supply of <br />residel)tialland. Therefore, the refinement 'plan adoption <br />is consistent with Statewide GoalIO." <br /> <br />The Downtown Plan, taking a ,broader perspective, finds. that the Plan, <br />a~ a whole, does encourage a yariety- of hO'Qsing and.ho.me ownership <br />.... in the downtown area. Of co~rse., a part of that is th'e provision. for <br />utilization of tinderutilized sites for commerci~ .purposes in. order to <br />revitalize downtown ~d serve downtown hoti~~ng. <br /> <br />An a.rp.endment to a refinement plan that, is part of a local <br />, government's compr~hensive plan, as is the Downtown Plan relative to <br />the Metro Plan, isa cQmprehensive plan amendment. See Graville' , <br />ProlJerties. Ltd. v. City of'Eugene, 2'( Or LU~A 583 (1994). In the <br />Graville Gase, the applicant sought an amendment to the Bethel- <br />Danebo Refinement Plan based upon identification of a ~ommercia1 <br />node in the Co~mercial Lands Study. The applicant had sought to <br />, , increase the amount ,of commercial land in the node from 5 to 15 acres <br />and .to amend the text of the Refinement Plan to state that the <br />; commercial development of the 15 acres should be at. an intensity or <br />, level consistent with the Community Commercial zone. <br />