Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Patricia Thomas, AlA <br />July 24,2006 <br />Page 8. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />subsequent to the adoption of the, DOWI1-town Plan. None of the <br />amendments to the .rules would alter the. positive findings made on the <br />. Statewide Goals at th.e time the Downtown Plan was adopted. . <br /> <br />'. . . <br /> <br />. The City Counci~ discussions, including" the final one, com~ to mind.. <br />," There. was. a reoccurri~g focus on facilitating redevelopment in the' <br />Downtown Plan area .(of course, this is expr~ssed.in the Plan itself) and <br />a concern that the Downtown Plan would "sit on a shelf' and not be <br />implemented. Certainly,' these will have proved prophetic andvalid <br />concerns if a clearly stated policy of the Downtown 'Plan is not <br />. implemented. <br /> <br />I would ask that you deem the application 'complete. Enclosed9.re <br />twelve sets of the application mater~als. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />James W. Spieker' .n. <br />soickerma.nCCUorbuslaw. com <br /> <br />jca <br />. cc: Client (w/enc) <br /> <br />Exhibits: <br />1. Notes 2/4/04 <br />2. E-~ai1, E. Jerome, 2/4/04 <br />3. City Council Agenda. Item Summary, 4/12/04 <br />. 4. State of Oregon letter 7 / 16 / 0'3 <br /> <br />. Enclosures: Application,. 12 sets <br />