Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Application, Referrals and Public Hearing Notice <br />The property subject to this request is the State of Oregon Motor Pool site, located at the southeast comer <br />of Pearl Street and 4th Avenue. It is approximately 1.71 acres in size. The property is currently being <br />used as surface parking for State motor pool vehicles. On April 21, 2006, the owner's representative <br />submitted applications to the City of Eugene for amendments to the Metro Plan as well as a concurrent <br />rezoning. Following the receipt of the City's completeness review comments, the applicant provided <br />supplemental materials on June 8, 2006. On July 14, 2006, the City requested additional information <br />related to potential transportation impacts. On July 24 and August 21, 2006, the applicant submitted <br />additional revised findings for Goal 1'2, Transportation. On July 28, 2006, the application ,was deemed <br />complete without the additional requested information, at the applicant's request. <br /> <br />As detailed in the attached staff report, referrals were provided to the appropriate agencies, and notice of <br />the public hearing was mailed and posted consistent with Eugene Code requirements (described further in <br />Attachment A, Findings). No letters of public testimony were received between the date of public notice <br />(August 18, 2006) and the date the staff report was prepared (September 12, 2006). Any written <br />comments received after the preparation of the staff report will be provided to the Planning Commission <br />at the public hearing for inclusion into the public record. <br /> <br />Applicable Criteria <br />The Eugene Planning Commission shall address the relevant approval criteria from sections 9.7730(3), <br />9.8424 and 9.8865 of the Eugene Code (EC) in making recommendations to the Eugene City Council on <br />the proposals, as listed.below. <br /> <br />EC 9.7730(3) Criteria for.Approval of Plan Amendment. <br />The following criteria shall be applied by the city council in approving or denying a Metro Plan <br />amendment application: <br />(a) The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted by <br />the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and <br />(b) Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. <br /> <br />EC 9.8865 Zone Chane:e Approval Criteria. <br />Approval of a zone change application, including the designation of an overlay zone, shall not be <br />approved unless it meets all of the following criteria: <br />(1) The proposed change is consistent with applicable provisions of the Metro Plan. The written <br />text of the Metro Plan shall take precedence over the Metro Plan diagram where apparent <br />conflicts or inconsistencies exist. <br />(2) The proposed zone change is consistent with applicable adopted refinement plans. In the <br />event of inconsistencies between these plans and the Metro Plan, the Metro Plan controls. <br />(3) The uses and density that will be allowed by the proposed zoning in the location of the <br />proposed change can be serVed through the orderly extension of key urban facilities and <br />services. <br />(4) The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable siting requirements set out for <br />the specific zone in: (a) EC 9.2150 Commercial Zone Siting Requirements. <br />(5) In cases where the NR zone is applied based on EC 9.2510(3), the property owner shall enter <br />into a contractual arrangement with the city to ensure the area is maintained as a natural <br />resource area for a minimum of 50 years. <br /> <br />Findings addressing the required approval criteria have been prepared by staff and are attached. <br />