Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT J <br /> <br />Attachment A <br /> <br />Staff Findings <br /> <br />Oregon State Motor Pool Site (MA 06-2, Z 06-9) <br /> <br />Metro Plan Diaeram Amendments <br /> <br />The proposed amendment would change the current Metro Plan land use designation of High Density <br />Residentiall Mixed UselNodal Development to CommerciallNodal Development. The High Density <br />Residential designation is intended for multi-unit developments of typically over 20 units per acre. The <br />Mixed Use designation is typically applied within a designated Special Area Plan, however, the subject <br />parcel is not located within a Special Area. There is no corresponding zoning that implements this <br />designation. The Nodal Development designation has been applied to all the downtown area to <br />recognize Eugene's central business district as a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly center, pursuant to OAR <br />660-012-0060(7). <br /> <br />Eugene Code Section 9.7730(3) requires that the following criteria be applied to a Metro Plan diagram <br />amendment: <br />(a) The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted by <br />the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and <br />(b) Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. <br /> <br />After review of the proposal, staff made a preliminary determination that additional information would <br />be needed to demonstrate the proposal's consistency with Statewide Goals, particularly with Goal 12, <br />Transportation, as required in criterion (3)(a) above. Staff requested additional information of the <br />applicant (applicant/applicant's representative) related to transportation, such as could be provided in a <br />traffic impact analysis. The additional information is not provided, for reasons stated in the application <br />materials. Based on the. information in the record, staff cannot make positive findings that the criterion <br />in EC 9.7730(3)(a) is satisfied. Staff finds that the approval criterion in EC 9.7730(3)(b) is satisfied. <br />Staff findings relative to both Metro Plan diagram amendment criteria in EC 9.7730(3) (with criteria in <br />bold italics) are presented below. <br /> <br />(aJ The am.endment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted by <br />the Land Conservation and Development Commission. <br /> <br />The applicant states that at the time of adoption of the Downtown Plan that "Goal findings were made <br />on all applicable Statewide Goals and the Downtown Plan, including the specific policies that called for <br />redesignation of particular pa~cels..." and that, therefore, "the direction of the Downtown Plan with <br />regard to this parcel is not conditional upon any additional findings of need or land use inventory <br />considerations" (applicant's letter to City of Eugene June 8, 2006). Staff does not concur with the <br />applicant's conclusion that. Statewide Goal findings have already been made supporting the specific <br />proposed Plan amendment. Below are staff findings relative to the proposal's consistency with all <br />Statewide Goals. <br /> <br />