My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 04/11/05 WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 04/11/05 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:27:40 AM
Creation date
6/17/2005 4:32:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would also seek an "A" rating. There were certain requirements for achieving that rating that would be <br />provided by the financial advisors. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor added that part of the assurance to the governing bodies was that the commission <br />would make its recommendation to the governing bodies, and any difference in their positions would be <br />referred to the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) for resolution. That resolution would then be referred <br />to the three jurisdictions for adoption. The resolution must assure the bond holders that the bonds were <br />sound. If the jurisdictions could not reach agreement through the MPC, the MWMC had the authority to <br />make those assurances. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked if all the additional capacity projected in the Facilities Plan was within the city limits of <br />Eugene and Springfield. Mr. Ruffler said the service area was within the urban growth boundaries of the <br />two cities. Ms. Bettman asked if revenues collected from fees paid by Eugene ratepayers and SDCs <br />collected from Eugene development were spent within the Eugene city limits only. In other words, did staff <br />apportion services and infrastructure proportionately to the revenue and where the revenue was geographi- <br />cally collected? Mr. Ruffler said no. Most of the money was spent within the Eugene city limits because <br />that was where the majority of the regional wastewater facilities were located. However, there were some <br />facilities located outside either city. Ms. Bettman clarified that she was focused on capacity. She asked if <br />wastewater fees were generated in the urbanizing areas, and maintained that residents of those areas paid no <br />SDCs because they were in the County. She maintained that to the degree the City was providing services to <br />the urban transition area, residents living within the city limits and in particular Eugene, with the largest <br />concentration of residents, were subsidizing the capacity of those rate payers. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman referred to sections 4 and 5 on page 17 of the IGA, which referred to "promoting" equity <br />between newly connected and previously connected users for contributions toward regional facilities and <br />between various classes of users based on the volume, flow, and characteristics of their discharge. In other <br />areas where equity was not being discussed, the IGA used terms such as "ensuring" and %omplying." She <br />interpreted "promoting" as a squishy word that did not guarantee equity. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman had a lot of problems with the IGA. Her largest problem was that it was not compliant with <br />City Growth Management Study policies that stated development was required to pay the full cost of <br />extending services. The plan contained capacity for new development, and if the City could not ensure that <br />SDCs could be collected at a rate that covered that capacity, the ratepayers would end up subsidizing it both <br />in Eugene, Springfield, and in the urban transition area. <br /> <br />Speaking to Ms. Bettman's question about whether the City's residents subsidized non-urban areas, Ms. <br />Smith clarified the only residents provided services outside the city limits were those in River Road/Santa <br />Clara, who were connected through a direct extension; in other words, they paid to extend service. User <br />rates were proportional on a flow basis, so they were based on the flow used and its strength, and that was <br />apportioned exactly by the users in either Springfield or Eugene. In regard to the SDC component, that was <br />done on a demand or capacity basis and came down to a unit cost. However many units were built in either <br />city paid the same amount. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith noted that the MWMC, under the direction of the governing bodies and the settlement agreement <br />with the Lane County Homebuilders Association, recently updated the SDC methodology with the criteria of <br />equity, fairness, and statutory compliance in mind. The experts hired to take the citizen committee and staff <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 11, 2005 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.