Laserfiche WebLink
Overview/Purpose <br />tƩƚƆĻĭƷ 5ĻƭĭƩźƦƷźƚƓ <br />Envision Eugene adoption process, the City expects to accommodate approximately 15,000 new homes <br />in the next 20 years within our current Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). We anticipate that a mixture of <br />diverse and changing needs over this period. Our housing needs must be also be balanced with the <br />related to neighborhood livability, public health and safety, economic opportunities, <br />and natural resource protections expressed through the Envision Eugene pillars. <br />Senate Bill 1051 amended the definition of means all <br />housing on land zoned for residential use or mixed residential and commercial use. Needed housing <br />includes the following housing types: attached and detached single-family, multiple family, government <br />assisted, mobile home or manufactured dwelling. Needed housing developments are entitled to a land <br />use application process under clear and objective approval standards as required by State law. <br />In 2001-e Eugene City Council adopted a <br />two-track system for the following types of land use applications: partitions, subdivisions, site reviews, <br />oval criteria required by state law for housing applications <br />The approval criteria included in the Needed <br />Housing tracks are intended to be clear and objective, and to offer a predictable path to approval for <br />housing projects that meet the criteria. The City also offers land use applicants an alternative process <br />that includes discretionary (i.e. subjective) approval criteria and is designed to allow more flexibility in <br />discretionary <br />track. Housing applicants are entitled to choose either track. An excerpt of <br />the applicable State statutes is provided at the end of this charter for reference. <br />Several of adopted clear and objective approval criteria are viewed by some as overly <br />burdensome or as barriers to housing; not necessarily the best way to achieve the regulatory intent; <br />and, in some instances increasing the cost or time required to obtain land use approvals and construct <br />housing. <br />time period, a number of legal challenges have occurred through land use appeals where the applicant <br />has asserted that our criteria violate State law because they are subjective, increase cost and <br />uncertainty, or are otherwise difficult to meet on certain sites. In their view, these criteria are a barrier <br />to housing and should be amended or repealed. <br />clear and objective approval criteria - <br />by the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) to violate the statutory requirement for being clear <br />and objective, and can no longer be applied. This is a problem for our community because we do not <br />have a clear and objective criterion in place that addresses concern about safe access to and from <br />developments. Additionally, a recent decision by the Eugene Hearings Official determined that the <br />Traffic Impact Analysis standards are not clear and objective. The purpose of the Traffic Impact Analysis <br />review, when applicable, is to ensure that developments provide facilities to accommodate the traffic <br /> <br />Page 3 | 16 <br />Draft Project Charter <br /> <br />