Laserfiche WebLink
Roll call vote; the amendment to the motion failed, 6:2; councilors Poling and Solomon <br /> voting in favor. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the main motion as amended passed, 7:1; Councilor Poling voting in <br /> opposition. <br /> <br />3. PUBLIC HEARING: <br /> An Ordinance Concerning Standards for Police Uniforms; Adding Section 2.665 to the Eugene <br /> Code, 1971; and Providing for an Effective Date <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor said this ordinance was being considered on a recommendation from the Police <br />Commission. He noted that Police Commissioner John Brown was available to answer questions. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Marlin Otto, 525-A Highway 99 North, said his company did not take issue with the ordinance, but <br />understood the spirit and purpose of it. He requested that in enforcing the ordinance the City keep safety <br />in mind. He stated that his business contracted with 99 percent of the alarm companies in the area and his <br />officers handled approximately 49 alarms in a week, a service no longer handled by the Eugene Police <br />Department (EPD). He explained that his employees were often responding to alarms in the backs of <br />warehouses or on other private properties and it was imperative that they were immediately recognizable <br />as security personnel. He underscored that his company had no interest in impersonating law <br />enforcement. <br /> <br />Floyd Prozanski, PO Box 11511, State Senator, stated that he was "wearing two hats" as he was also <br />testifying as a member of the Police Commission. He supported the ordinance. He said the ordinance <br />would keep individuals other than members of the EPD from wearing or using or authorizing the use of <br />any part of the police uniforms. He added that some exemptions for other sworn law enforcement officers <br />were made and there would be a transition clause allowing time for a security company that would be <br />financially impacted to change its uniform. He reported that Senate Bill 547, a bill that would parallel <br />what the commissioners were asking the City Council to do, passed through the Senate and was now in the <br />House Judiciary Committee. After some review, it had been determined that it would not be possible to <br />create a statewide law to accomplish the intent of the ordinance as there were too many different uniforms <br />that sworn officers wore. The State law would only prohibit using a badge or identification to <br />impersonate an officer. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 asked Eugene Police Chief Bob Lehner if the City had been experiencing problems. Chief <br />Lehner responded that there were not presently any security firms whose uniforms could be confused with <br />those of the EPD. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor affirmed for Councilor Bettman that the council could take action at the present <br />meeting with unanimous council consent. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called for a five-minute break at 8:57 p.m., in part to allow legal counsel to determine the <br />ordinance number. The council reconvened at 9:05 p.m. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 23, 2005 Page 10 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />