Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br /> MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Work Session <br /> McNutt Room--City Hall <br /> <br /> May 25, 2005 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: George Poling, Jennifer Solomon, Betty Taylor, David Kelly, Gary Pap6, <br /> Bonny Bettman, Andrea Ortiz, Chris Pryor. <br /> <br />Mayor Kitty Piercy convened the work session of the Eugene City Council. <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: <br /> City Hall/Police Building Priority Issue Action Plan <br /> <br />City Manager Dennis Taylor said this issue had been identified by the City Council as a strategic priority <br />at its goal-setting retreat. He stated that it was the first of the eight priorities staff had brought before the <br />council in an action plan format. Because of this, he continued, an entire work session would be devoted <br />to the item, to be presented by Assistant City Manager Jim Carlson and Principal Facility Project Manager <br />for the Facilities Division Mike Penwell. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson indicated that this was the fifth City Council discussion of this issue since the election in <br />November 2004, at which time the bond measure failed. After the bond was defeated, he recalled that the <br />previous council had decided not to move forward on the building and had deferred further consideration <br />until more ideas could be brought to the table in January 2005, to further determine the scope of the work. <br />The City Council moved $15 million into the Facilities Reserve Fund in anticipation of moving forward <br />with the project in November. He related that the present City Council considered the issue on January <br />10, 2005, and but no action was taken because Ms. Bettman was not present. He felt it had been clear the <br />council was not ready to embark on a full master planning process. <br /> <br /> Ms. Solomon arrived. <br /> <br /> Mr. Carlson continued with a recap of the discussion to date. He said while staff and the council had <br /> ruled out the possible co-location of the Lane County Sheriff' s Office (LCSO) and the Eugene Police <br /> Department (EPD), there still existed the possibility that some space in a new building could be used for <br /> purposes other than the direct work of the City. Further discussion was needed on whether to replace or <br /> renovate City Hall. He observed there had been general consensus to consolidate existing City services in <br /> one place and to cease renting downtown space, though police could be in a separate facility. <br /> <br /> Mr. Carlson stated that staff continued to believe that a full master planning process with public input <br /> would cost $750,000. He agreed that it was a large amount but pointed out that the Eugene Water & <br /> Electric Board (EWEB) was embarking on a similar process and planned to spend $1.1 million on initial <br /> design work for a new site. He averred that the City's plans were more complicated than those of EWEB. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 25, 2005 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />