My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Admin Order 56-06-04-F
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Administrative Orders
>
2006
>
Admin Order 56-06-04-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:47:48 AM
Creation date
11/30/2006 12:39:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Admin Orders
Document_Date
11/28/2006
Document_Number
56-06-04-F
CMO_Effective_Date
11/28/2006
Author
Dennis M. Taylor
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />of $0.00, are provided the same amount of in:-game currency, and the winning player receives <br />$0.00, such a tournament is appropriate under this administrative rule. No changes are being <br />made to the rule as a result of these comments. <br /> <br />Comments Reeardine Proposed Additional Definitions. Several respondents proposed adding <br />definitions of some or all of the following terms to this administrative rule: dealer, button, table, <br />chips or tokens, facility, imprest tray, pot, proposition, shill, bet, raise, floor or floorperson) stub, <br />advancing button, and winner. <br /> <br />Findines. Many of these terms do not appear in the text of the administrative rule so there is no <br />reason to include their definitions. Those terms that do appear can be adequately understood by <br />their context and common dictionary definitions. As a result of these comments and in order to <br />clarify the provisions of this administrative rule, I have added definitions of the terms "blind," <br />"button," "dealer" and "deal" to this administrative rule. <br /> <br />Comments Reeardine the Number of Allowable Players Per Table. Several respondents <br />commented that they would like the number of players per table never to be less than four (4), <br />nor to exceed ten (10). <br /> <br />Findines. The requirement of a maximum of eight (8) players per table is the same requirement <br />found in the previous regulations regarding social gaming, adopted by Administrative Order No. <br />53-85-09 on December 23, 1985. However, I find that neither the Eugene Code nor state statutes <br />prohibit a number of players per table exceeding eight (8). Therefore, in light of public <br />comments, I have amended this administrative rule to provide that the maximum number of <br />players per table shall not exceed ten (10). <br /> <br />Comments Reeardine the Minimum Allowable Aee for Participation in City Authorized <br />Social Games. Several respondents commented that they felt the minimum age for participation <br />in social games in private businesses, private clubs, or places of public accommodation should be <br />twenty-one (21) rather than eighteen (18). <br /> <br />Findines. Eighteen (18) is the age of majority for every right and responsibility except the <br />consumption of alcohol. So long as alcohol is not sold or served on the premises of a social <br />gaming establishment in contravention of other laws, adults eighteen (18) years of age and older <br />may participate in social gaming. No changes are being made to the rule as a result of these <br />comments. <br /> <br />Comments Reeardine Smoke/Alcohol Free Facilities. Several respondents expressed their <br />appreciation for the ability to play social games in a smoke and alcohol free environment. These <br />respondents also expressed their concern that social gaming establishments will resort to selling <br />alcoholic beverages in order to make a profit because they cannot charge players for the privilege <br />of participating in social games. <br /> <br />Findines. I recognize the value of the choice to recreate in smoke and alcohol free facilities, but <br />the City of Eugene cannot authorize what state law prohibits and as noted in previous findings, <br />state law prohibits house income from the operation of a social game. Nothing in this <br /> <br />Administrative Order - Page 4 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.