Item A: Public Hearing onMetro Plan Amendment (Delta Sand and Gravel)

Home Browse Search

out by the ..pplicant. The eventual loss ofthese"thI'ee dwellings wilt. not measurably impact the acknowledged housing inventory for the Metro Area. Therefore, ibis PAPA does, not conflict with the 'purpose and intent o( this Ooal. . Goal 11 ~Public Facilities 'and Services Approval of this PAPA would result i~ a natural resource use of the expansion area tbat will not require . the ~tension of any p~blic facilities. or services' in the future. Therefore,' the PAPA is consistent with the intent and purpose of thii Goal. '. G081.12.-T~portation '. , The applicant pr.oposes to process the mined material (rom the expansion site on the adjacent property where tb~ approved processmg facility owDed by the applicant is sited today, so ,that, traffic is ~temal to the Delta Company Property. Lane County Transportation Engineering Division has waived fhe req~ent fur further aDaIysis of impacts' to loCal roads because the percentage increase of traffic, on . local roads is below th~ DUnimum required fOf" further ~lysis. Because negligible increase in product delivery or service win ocCur if this PAPA is approved,. the . policies and objectives 'of Goal 12 are consistent with this.pfopoSal. ' Goal 13 - Bner", Conservation , . , . , The proposed use of the expalision site.wiI1 provide continued stable and long.tennaggregate within close. proximity to the Metro area market. From. an energy conservation perspective, locating these resources clo~e. to oonstiuction activity. redu~ fuel, us~ and maximizes energy efficiency. during , .' co~ction and deVeloplnent~ Therefore, the PAPA is conSistent. with this Goal. . , 'GoalI4~UrhAni7Jltion . . ..' '_ _ The expansion. site' is outsid~ the urban growth boundary and therefore is ,not urbanizable l~d. Only . resourCe use is' proposed for the 'site, no' additional. urban . facilities or services apply to the site, theref~re, the PAPA is consistent with this goal. Goal 1 S - Willamette River Greenway The ex~ion area is oUf:8ide the Willamette Gr~way, sa this Goal dOes not apply., Goals' 16. 17. 18. and 19 '- Estuarine. Coastal ShorelaJP. Beaches and Dunes. and Ocean ResoUrces . These are the Coastal Resources Goals that do-not apply to this PAPA due to geographic' loCation. Setbaek Variance Criteria LC 16.217 The applicant bas .requested a VIUiance to the setback requirements in LC 16~217 (4) (b) (v) Set~ks . . for'Excavation. Thevsriance would make it possible to allow the construction of a 'low-perm~ility . . barrier' (also called an, aquaclude)'within the setback area that would be designed and built to eliminate . the flow of groundwa~erftom the sUlTOUildiri.g land into the pit created by a~ate mining.. . . "'I . LC16.217 (4) (v)' Setbacks for Excavation. . EXcavation shall not be oonducted closer than 150 feet to any property boundary, except as herein provided; " . (all) The.Director may grant,an' adm,,,istrative variance to decrease a setback upon showing .that ,the . eventUal utilization of the site is compatible, w~th a smal~er setback.up to the/ollowing minimums.~ (i-I) Fifty feet from the bo'undaryof any' nonresiden.tial zone, or the right-of-way of an ~tingstreet or road." . .. (U-ti) One ~undredleet from the boundary of a residen'tial zone. . .. BoardICountit Hearing- Ordinance No. PA 1238 Agenda Cover Memo Delta ~and & Gravel EXpaDsion "