Laserfiche WebLink
<br />necessary to assure compliance with these requirements and shal/not provide opportunities to deny <br />mini~g for reasons unrelated to these requirements. or to attach additional approv(ll requirements. <br />except with regard to mi~ing orpr~cessing a~t;vities:' ' <br /> <br />(A) For which the fAPA ,application does n~t provide information 'sufficient to determine clear and <br />objective measures to resolve identified conflicts; . <br />The Planning Commissions did. not feel. there was sufficient infonnation regarding the location or <br />functionality of the aquaclude to convince the majority that the. conflictS due to dust (pluS wetlands, <br />flooding, and groundwater for the Lane County PI~g Commission) were ~nimized. <br />, (B) Not requested;n the PAPA application,. or <br />(C) For which a siinificant change .to the type, location, or duration of the activity shown on the PAPA <br />-f applicatio~ is proposed by the operator. ' , <br /> <br />If the application is approved, Staffrecommends that any'minimization measures to reduce or eliminate <br />conflicts, are compiled into a, set of clear and objective conditions applicable to' the Plan and <br />hnplemcnting regulations adopted to allow mining of the exp~ion area. <br /> <br />(f) Where mining is allowed, the local govemment shall determine . the Post-mining .use and provide for <br />this use !n the comprehensive plan and land use regulations. For significant 'aggregate sites on ClaSs <br />.1, n and Unique farmland, IocalgoVemments shall adopt piq" and Itmd use regulations to .limit post- <br />mining use tofarm Uses under'ORS 215.2~3, uses listed under ORS 215.213(1) ~r 215.283(1),Cmdjish <br />and wildlife habitat ~es, including wetland mitigation ban1cing. weal governments shall coordinate., <br />with DOGAMI regarding the regulation and reclamation of mineral and aigregqte'sites, except where <br />exempt ~nl!er. ORS 517.-780. ' <br /> <br />, ., The'applicant would amend the existing Operating and Reclamation Plan to include the expansion <br />~.Theexisting reclamation plan for the adjacent mining and processing site is included in the <br />.record,sec FOe Reeord No. 17. DOOAMIprovides an :~te to Delta's Operating Pemiit <br />Amendment Application in E:ddblt 49 that addresses the addition of the ~ion Area to the <br />existing Plan ' upon approval. The conditioliS in Exhibit C to the Ordinance willbe'required to be <br />included in an updated Operating and Reclamation Plan lhat includes, the, e:ql~ion' arei. <br /> <br />(g) Local governments shall allow. a cun-enily approved aggregate processing operation ,at an existing site <br />to proceSs material from. a new or expll1l3ion site without, requiring a reauthorization of the existing <br />processing operation Unless limits on such processing were establ#~edat the' time it lmS approved by <br />the local government. ' <br /> <br />This provision permits the material excavated from the subject PfOP~ to be transported to the <br />~djacent exist~g J?elta ~sing ,facility 'without 'further review. of the existing, processing <br />W~oo. ., <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />. Alternatives/Qptions , <br />, 1, Hold the record open for the submittal of additional iriformation from parties in this matter. <br /> <br />The Board and ~ounc~ will hear a consid~ble amount of testimony on this application <br />,"during, the November 1st hearing. 'Presumably, the applicant or other parties will requeSt the <br />record lobe held open for the ~~mitta1.of additiona,l information, to respond to new evidence <br />'presented at the, hearings. The follow4tg timeframes ,should be decided upon if this option is <br />chosen. <br /> <br />. '. . BOmtICouncil HearilIg:" Ordinance No.' P A.1238 , ' <br />Ag~ Cover'Memo <br /> <br />Delta, Sand & Oravet. Expansion <br />