My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: City Council Priority Issue - City Hall Complex
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 12/11/06 Work Session
>
Item B: City Council Priority Issue - City Hall Complex
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:12:04 PM
Creation date
12/7/2006 11:51:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />six concept options for the Butterfly Lot/Rock N Rodeo site revised to show the updated costs <br />related to site acquisition. The total costs for the six concept options on the existing City Hall <br />site range from $114.4 million to $118.4 million. The total costs for the six concept options on <br />the Butterfly Lot/Rock N Rodeo site range from $126.8 million to $129.2 million, not including <br />a replacement site for the County Courthouse. <br /> <br />Additional Consultant Work <br />As an alternative to selecting a site at the work session, the council could direct the design team <br />to perform an additional study to investigate the opportunities and constraints of each site in <br />more detail and, if desired by the council, present the results at an additional Community Forum. <br />The study could include further development of the phasing possibilities for each site (in lieu of <br />the complete 25 year build-out), future expansion opportunities beyond a 25-year build-out, a <br />more informed concept design on each site, and the associated costs. Additional public input <br />could then be received at a Community Forum to be held in February 2007. Materials from the <br />additional study and results from the Community Forum would then be presented to the council <br />in a work session in late February or early March. <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />The City Hall Complex master planning and public participation process relates to the council <br />goals of an effective, accountable municipal government, a safe community, and sustainable <br />community growth and change. <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br />The council may decide to select a site for use in Schematic Design during the Implementation <br />Plan Phase or direct the design team to perform additional study to investigate each site's <br />opportunities, constraints, and costs in more detail prior to commencing the Implementation Plan <br />Phase. Council may also decide to have the consultant team hold an additional Community <br />Forum on site selection to inform the council's decision-making process. <br /> <br />CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION <br />Due to the greater flexibility and lower cost of the existing City Hall site, and the proximity to <br />potential future expansion space, the City Manager recommends the existing City Hall site be <br />carried forward for use in Schematic Design. <br /> <br />SUGGESTED MOTION <br />Move to select the existing City Hall site for use in Schematic Design. <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />A. Summary of Site Pros and Cons <br />B. Comparative Site Costs <br />C. Comparative Cost Model Summary <br />D. Human Rights Commission Meeting Notes, November 21,2006 <br /> <br />LICMOl2006 Council AgendasIM061211IS061211B.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.