Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Green said the Whiteaker council had chosen to condemn the manner in which the police <br />conducted a raid in the Whiteaker neighborhood in October 2002. She expressed her pleasure <br />that the Police Commission had decided to review SWAT policies and protocols. <br /> <br />Zachary Vishanoff, Fairmount neighborhood, urged the council to take an interest in what he <br />called the University's mismanagement of affairs in that neighborhood. <br /> <br />Lauren Heitzman, 3395 West 7th Avenue, spoke against a proposed motor vehicle fuel tax. He <br />urged the council to remember that the economy was going through a rough time and commented <br />that raising taxes would not stop the situation. He remarked that the council was out of touch with <br />the community. <br /> <br />Karl Sorg, 1555 West 18th Avenue, spoke for the implementation of a living wage ordinance. He <br />said it was essential to give Iow-income people a decent wage. <br /> <br />Sarah Charlesworth, 2373 Pershing Street, spoke as vice chair of Trainsong Neighborhood <br />Association. She spoke in support of a living wage. She read from the universal declaration of <br />human rights regarding wages for workers. <br /> <br />Nick Urhausen, 2858 Warren Street, said a living wage was a fiscal fantasy. He said the City <br />should be mindful of what was being paid by others. He said the market determined what labor <br />was worth. <br /> <br />Greg McLauchlan, 2401 West 22nd Avenue, spoke in favor of a living wage standard. He said <br />paying City workers less than a living wage would mean that some of them would require social <br />services that the City was struggling to pay for. He called for a baseline in City salaries of $12 <br />hourly with health benefits and said it would not be too difficult for the City to provide. <br /> <br />Dal Ollek, 415 Court Drive, President of AFSCME Local 1724, spoke in support of a living wage. <br />He said a living wage would increase worker happiness and performance. He said the proposal <br />would make Eugene's economy would more healthy and would make the City a better place to <br />live. <br /> <br />Salmon Stroich, 570-1/2 West 10th Avenue, spoke in support of a living wage. He noted that he <br />had been a City of Eugene employee for ten years and had benefits for only four of those years. <br />He said he had not seen a dentist or a doctor for 14 years since he could not afford medical care. <br />He said this was the standard of life for those without benefits and lower paying jobs. He noted <br />that he had a college degree and was not a pad-time teenager looking for extra money from a <br />summer job. He asked if the council's vision for the City was that it be a place where people had <br />to look somewhere else if they wanted basic benefits and stable income. <br /> <br />Mr. Stroich called for a clarification of whether Councilor Papa's company would benefit from a <br />decision to reject a living wage standard, and whether that was a conflict of interest. <br /> <br />John Pitney, 1243 Melvina Way, urged the council to keep considering a living wage standard for <br />the City. He urged the council to be an example of hope in a time of fear. <br /> <br />Bob Bussel, 3054 Grand Cayman drive, spoke as the Director of the Labor, Education and <br />Research Center at the University of Oregon. He said he supported a living wage standard <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 27, 2003 Page 3 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />