Laserfiche WebLink
4.ACTION: Resolution 4755 Adopting Amended Systems Development Charge <br /> Methodologies and Repealing the Systems Development Charge Methodologies <br /> Adopted by Resolution Nos. 4740 and 4748 <br /> <br /> Mr. Pap~, seconded by Councilor Nathanson, moved to approve Resolution <br /> 4755 adopting amended Systems Development Charge Methodologies as <br /> amended by the four corrected pages of the Methodologies included as <br /> Attachment C to the agenda item summary and repealing the Systems <br /> Development Charge Methodologies adopted by Resolution Nos. 4740 and <br /> 4748. <br /> <br />Data Services Manager Fred McVey of the Public Works Department asked the council to take <br />action on the item, noting that two of the modifications being proposed had their origin in two <br />advisory committees that had diverse representation, the Public Works Rates Advisory <br />Committee and the Stormwater Systems Development Charge and User Fee Department <br />Advisory Committee. He thanked the members of the committees for their time and effort. Mr. <br />McVey reminded the council of the work sessions and public hearings conducted on the items, <br />which resulted in some minor modifications to the proposed parks systems development charge <br />(SDC) rate calculation. He said that the combined total increase would be about $277 for a <br />typical single-family house, or about six percent. Even with the increase, Eugene's residential <br />SDC rates would remain among the lowest four in Oregon of 16 mid-sized and large communities <br />surveyed. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for comments from the council. <br /> <br />Referring to the geographic adjustment proposed for the transportation SDC, Councilor <br />Nathanson suggested it would be defensible to adopt something that matched the technical <br />findings. She recalled staff's December presentation of Revenue-Neutral Scenario 2A, which <br />had numbers more closely paralleling the technical analysis. That scenario was based on a 15 <br />percent discount in Zone 1, and a 3 percent surcharge in zone 2. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson expressed appreciation to staff for correcting the errors identified in the <br />parks SDC calculation. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson believed there was value to development outside the core. While she <br />wanted to foster downtown development, Councilor Nathanson said that not all development <br />needed to be downtown. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson indicated interest in different percentages for the discount and surcharge <br />associated with the geographic adjustment. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly thanked Roxie Cuellar of the Lane County Homebuilders Association for the <br />testimony submitted. He thanked staff for incorporating some of the association's suggestions <br />for changes in the recommendation before the council. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly supported the resolution as prepared, as he believed revenue neutrality was <br />provided for in the transportation SDC recommendation. In addition, the resolution supported the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 28, 2003 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />