Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Nathanson said the decision was a political one. She said the issue, for her, was what <br />was the best tribute for Dr. King. She called for the council to reconcile the community. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon said she had been disappointed with the process. She said it had turned into <br />a "Centennial Boulevard or nothing" debate. She said there were many creative alternatives to <br />honor Dr. King and remarked that she did not see anything creative about renaming a street. She <br />expressed her pleasure that the original motion had a date limit attached. She urged the council <br />to take action by October 15 so the action could be celebrated on Martin Luther King Day. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor noted that the motion only called for a report back to the council by October <br />15. He said he believed that if Councilor Papa's motion prevailed, he could have something for <br />action by October 15. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon stressed the importance of making a commitment to taking action by that date. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson said that sometimes the council did extend processes or make alternative <br />proposals to what public input or another committee had recommended. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said he was deeply disturbed by comments that Eugene was a racist community. <br />He said he would accept such a statement from members of the African-American, Hispanic, or <br />Middle Eastern communities but would not accept such statements from those who were not <br />raised in those communities. He stressed that he refused to be labeled without challenging such <br />a statement. He said for him to agree with the motion to put another committee in place he <br />would, in fact, accept the recommendation of the African-American community as the decision <br />that he would support. He added that if there was a tie vote among the council he would vote that <br />evening to rename Centennial Boulevard after Martin Luther King Jr. He said it was time for the <br />council to move forward. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly said the Register-Guard had commented that the City Council should move swiftly <br />to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission and avoid further dithering over <br />whether another alternative were preferable. He said shunting the decision off to another <br />committee would be divisive to the community. He added that if another committee were formed <br />to address the issue, any decision they made would have to go to the Planning Commission for a <br />recommendation which would cause further delay. He stressed that the same City Council had <br />voted unanimously, on January 13, to direct the city manager to start the process for renaming <br />Centennial Boulevard. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Pap~ regarding whether the Planning Commission <br />process would have to be repeated if his proposed committee decided on Centennial Boulevard, <br />Mr. Klein said the council could simply move forward with the renaming process. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman noted that councilors Poling and Solomon had both referred to informal <br />conversations with their constituents regarding the issue and questioned whether, in a quasi- <br />judicial matter, consideration was supposed to be limited to the testimony on the record. Mr. Klein <br />confirmed that in a quasi-judicial matter, the council could only consider testimony on the record <br />which was closed at the end of the last public hearing. Councilor Bettman stressed that the <br />council needed to consider only the material on the record and not on informal comments to <br />councilors. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 9, 2003 Page 9 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />