Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit C <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Chase/LeCompte (A 18-4) August 2018 Page 2 <br />Policy 15. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with <br />the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time frame for <br />annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions from urbanizable to <br />urban. (page 11-C-5) <br />The following policy from the Residential Element of the Metro Plan is also applicable: <br />Policy A.2 Residentially designated land within the UGB should be zoned consistent with <br />the Metro Plan, and applicable plans and policies; however, existing agricultural zoning <br />may be continued within the area between the city limits and UGB until rezoned for <br />urban uses. <br />The Metro Plan designates the annexation area as appropriate for high-density <br />residential use. The Willakenzie Area Plan (WAP) is the adopted refinement plan for the <br />subject properties and also designates the area for high-density residential use. The <br />property is currently zoned AG Agricultural and /UL Urbanizable Lands Overlay. The /UL <br />overlay will be automatically removed from the zoning following annexation approval. <br />With regard to applicable policies of the WAP, the subject property is located within the <br />Chase Gardens Subarea. None of the listed policies for this subarea appear to be directly <br />applicable to the subject property. The proposed annexation does not appear to conflict <br />with any of the Land Use Policies or Residential Policies. The "Public Facilities and <br />Services Element" policies of the WAP are directed at local government; however, the <br />premise of these policies (regarding the provision of urban services) is the assumption <br />that the properties within the UGB will be annexed. <br />As previously discussed in this subsection, and further detailed under subsection (3) <br />below, the proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan growth management <br />policies and can be served by the minimum level of key urban services. The annexation <br />procedures beginning at EC 9.7800 are consistent with State law and therefore, as found <br />throughout this report, the annexation is consistent with State law. <br />Therefore, based on the findings above, the proposal is consistent with the applicable <br />policies of the Metro Plan and refinement plan. <br />EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key <br />urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an <br />orderly, efficient, and timely manner. <br />Complies <br />Findings: Consistent with this criterion, the proposed annexation will result in a <br />boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be <br />® <br />❑ No <br />YES <br />provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner as detailed below: <br />Wastewater <br />A 15 -inch public wastewater line is located North of the subject property on Kinsrow <br />Avenue. There are no on hold wastewater assessments on this tax lot. <br />Chase/LeCompte (A 18-4) August 2018 Page 2 <br />