My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 9-19-18 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2018
>
09-19-2018
>
Agenda Packet 9-19-18 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2018 1:21:51 PM
Creation date
9/14/2018 1:13:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Coburg Road Corridor begins at the Eugene Station <br />and continues to Coburg Road using the Ferry Street Bridge. <br />The corridor continues north on Coburg Road to Crescent <br />Avenue, east on Crescent Avenue, south on Shadow View <br />Drive, east on Chad Drive to Old Coburg Road, and south on N. Game Farm Road <br />and Gateway Street to the existing Gateway Station at the Gateway Mall. Although <br />service extends from N. Game Farm Road to the Gateway Station, capital investments <br />proposed as part of the MovingAhead project would terminate at Interstate 5 (I-5). <br />Overview <br />Although the two build alternatives are rated more <br />favorably than the No-Build Alternative, the EmX <br />Alternative in this corridor has the highest capital <br />cost of all the corridor alternatives considered and <br />would require the most property acquisition. The <br />Enhanced Corridor Alternative has a lower cost, less <br />impact, and an equivalent improvement in transit <br />travel time than the EmX Alternative, but has lower <br />projected ridership. <br />The No-Build Alternative avoids cost and impacts <br />(including property acquisitions, off-street and on- <br />street parking impacts, and potential tree removal). <br />What We Heard <br />• The VA clinic and all the new development at <br />Crescent and further north have limited bus <br />service and bikeway options. <br />• Auto access to businesses must be maintained <br />• Coburg is scary with fast moving traffic <br />• Bicycle and pedestrian crossings are difficult <br />• Bicycling facilities separated from traffic are <br />important <br />• The corridor is important for autos, given the <br />nature of development and connection to <br />freeways <br />Addressing Community Concerns <br />The build alternatives provide investments in <br />bicycle and pedestrian connectivity and safety, as <br />well as improved transit service and connections <br />to areas north of Beltline. Additionally, questions <br />came up about how business impacts would be <br />minimized. Both build options propose infrastructure <br />investments that stay within the existing right of way <br />as much as possible. <br />Coburg Road <br />6 ½ <br />MILES <br />Coburg Road Corridor Coburg Road Corridor: Comparison of AlternativesThis map shows the transit, bicycle, and pedestrian investments included in the <br />Coburg Road Enhanced Corridor Alternative. The table below provides a comparison <br />of this alternative with the No-Build and EmX Alternatives.Coburg Road Corridor <br />Enhanced Corridor Alternative <br />25,000 25,000 36,000 <br />41,000 41,000 <br />50,000 <br />0 9 149 <br />0/0 47/1 73/4 <br />0 0 2 <br />0/0 0/67 7/128 <br />105 <br />5 <br />RANDY PAPE BELTLINE <br />CRESCENT AVE <br />N <br /> <br />G <br />A <br />M <br />E <br /> <br />F <br />A <br />R <br />M <br /> <br />R <br />D <br />C <br />O B U R G R D <br />WILLAKENZIE RD <br />BAILEY LN <br />HARLOW RD <br />MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD <br />W 6TH AVE <br />W 7TH AVE <br />SHELDON HIGH SCHOOL <br />MONROEMIDDLE SCHOOL <br />SKINNERBUTTEPARK <br />ALTONBAKERPARK <br />UNIVERSITYOF OREGON <br />PE <br />A <br />R <br />L <br /> <br />S <br />T <br />OL <br />I <br />V <br />E <br /> <br />S <br />T <br />OA <br />K <br /> <br />S <br />T <br />W I L L A M E T T E RIV <br />E <br />RW 11TH AVE <br />M <br />c <br />K <br />E <br />N <br />Z <br />IE RIVER <br />1/4 1/2 3/40 1 Mile <br />N <br />Dedicated Transit Lane <br />Business Access & Transit Lane <br />Roadway Improvements <br />No Roadway Changes <br />Existing EmX Line <br />New or Improved Stop <br />Existing Stop <br />Bicycling improvements <br />Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing <br />Bicycling <br />Walking <br />Driving & Riding <br />MAP LEGEND <br />Business Access and Transit Lanes at I-105 <br />Intersection with Queue Jump <br />Existing <br />1 <br />1 <br />Service continues into Springfield <br />without infrastructure investments <br />EmXNo-Build EnhancedCorridor <br />$0.0M $41.0M $113.0M <br />$0.0M $1.8M$0.0M <br />0 min 5 min 5 min <br />0 63,000 258,000 <br />1 Mitigation measures would be used to avoid or reduce impacts <br />Supports Project <br />Criteria <br />Does not Support <br />Project Criteria <br />Jobs <br />Population <br />Existing Jobs & Population Served <br />Support Development and Redevelopment <br />(1-5 rating) <br />Number of Medium and Large Trees Impacted <br />Number/Acreage of Acquisitions <br />Potential Property Displacements <br />Parking Impacts: On-Street/O-Street <br />(number of spaces) <br />Property & Development Impacts <br />New Bike/Ped Access and Safety Improvements <br />(1-5 rating) <br />Bicycling & Walking <br />Cost <br />Capital Cost <br />Systemwide Annual Operating Cost <br />(Change from No-Build) <br />Systemwide Annual Ridership Increase <br />(Compared to No-Build) <br />Transit Performance <br />In-Vehicle Transit Travel Time Savings <br />Lorem ipsum <br />Coburg Road Corridor | 2322 | Executive Summary: MovingAhead Alternatives Analysis Report September 19, 2018, Work Session - Item 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.