Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES – Eugene City Council Meeting July 23, 2018 Page 4 <br /> <br />7. ACTION: An Ordinance Concerning the Location of Recreational Retail Marijuana Uses <br /> and Amending Sections 9.2160, 9.2161, 9.2450, 9.2451, 9.3115, 9.3116, 9.3146, <br /> 9.3210, 9.3211, 9.3515, 9.3810, 9.3811, 9.3910 and 9.3911 of the Eugene Code, 1971. <br /> (City File CA 18-4) <br /> <br /> MOTION: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to adopt Council Bill 5195, an Ordinance Concerning the Location of Recreational Retail Marijuana Uses. Council Discussion <br />• Do not believe Council should intervene in the marketplace or treat these businesses differently than other legal businesses. <br />• Statistics from EPD do not show increase in crime around marijuana retail shops. <br />• Supportive of the ordinance, but would like to explore mitigating any unintended consequences that result from this ordinance. <br />• Important to ensure that downtown is healthy and attractive to a broad range of visitors. <br />• Passing this ordinance will have little effect because the current shops are already grandfathered in. VOTE: PASSED 5:3, Councilors Taylor, Zelenka, and Syrett opposed. <br />8. ACTION : An Ordinance Concerning the Prohibition of Smoking on Public Right-of-Way <br /> Adjacent to Opted-In Properties; the Prohibition of Smoking Within the Downtown Core <br /> and Allowing for Properties to Opt-Out; and Amending Section 6.230 of the Eugene Code, <br /> 1971. <br /> <br /> MOTION: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to adopt Council Bill 5196, an Ordinance Concerning the Prohibition of Smoking on Public Right-of-way Adjacent to Opted-In Properties; the Prohibition of Smoking Within the Downtown Core and Allowing for Properties to Opt-Out. MOTION TO AMEND: Councilor Semple, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to delete ordinance Section 2 in its entirety. <br /> Council Discussion <br />• Concern expressed that the Council is singling out downtown and showing that it cares more about the health of individuals downtown; would like the ban to be citywide. <br />• There hasn’t been a real discussion about the science of this proposal or the affects it may have on downtown. <br />• A smoke-free downtown is not arbitrary, but is based on valid research regarding smart public health policy; eliminating smoke where there are large concentrations of people is prudent. VOTE ON MOTION TO AMEND: FAILED 3:5, Councilors Semple, Taylor, and Clark in favor. MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE: Councilor Semple, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to substitute the following motion for the motion to adopt the ordinance: Move to direct the City Manager to schedule a public hearing on an ordinance prohibiting smoking on public rights-of-way citywide and allowing for properties to opt-out. <br /> <br /> <br />