Agenda Packet 9-10-18 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Jesse Brabham (A 18‐2) September 2018 Page 2 Policy 15. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time frame for annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions from urbanizable to urban. (page II‐C‐5) The following policy from the Residential Element of the Metro Plan is also applicable: Policy A.2 Residentially designated land within the UGB should be zoned consistent with the Metro Plan, and applicable plans and policies; however, existing agricultural zoning may be continued within the area between the city limits and UGB until rezoned for urban uses. The Metro Plan designates the annexation area as appropriate for residential use. The River Road ‐ Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (RR/SC UFP) is the adopted refinement plan for the subject property and also designates the area for residential uses. The property is currently zoned Low‐Density Residential with Urbanizable Land Overlay (R‐1/UL). The /UL overlay will be automatically removed from the zoning following annexation approval. With regard to applicable policies of the RR/SC UFP, the subject property is not located within any of the described subareas. Further, none of the general “Residential Land Use Policies” at Section 2.2 appear to be directly applicable to the subject request. The “Public Facilities and Services Element” policies of the RR/SC UFP are directed at local government; however, the premise of these policies (regarding the provision of urban services) is the assumption that the property within the UGB will be annexed. As previously discussed in this subsection, and further detailed under subsection (3) below, the proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan growth management policies and can be served by the minimum level of key urban services. The annexation procedures beginning at EC 9.7800 are consistent with State law and therefore, as found throughout this report, the annexation is consistent with State law. Therefore, based on the findings above, the proposal is consistent with the applicable policies of the Metro Plan and applicable refinement plan. EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner. Complies Findings: Consistent with this criterion, the proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner as detailed below: Wastewater According to the as‐constructed drawings, an 8‐inch public wastewater line exists within Maclay Drive directly in front of the subject property, however, no connection record was found. As an informational item, there is an on hold wastewater assessment for this tax lot that will need to be paid prior to any development. YES NO September 10, 2018, Meeting - Item 2C