My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MInutes - 06/25/03 WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2003
>
CC MInutes - 06/25/03 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:29:35 AM
Creation date
7/8/2005 1:14:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/25/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was too much into regulation and not enough into problem solving. She found the statement <br />important. Ms. Nathanson referred to page 16, saying she found the conclusion that Eugene's <br />practices were well within the norm of other jurisdictions and states to be worth noting. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bettman regarding which recommendations the department <br />planned to implement in the short-, medium-, and long-term, and if there were recommendations <br />the department did not intend to implement, Mr. Coyle said that he did not know if the City could <br />staff the code it now had in place. There were many standards, and once implemented, they must <br />be measured, monitored, and reviewed. He estimated that sufficient staffing for the code required <br />six planners, and the City had three planners. The City's current regulatory approach hampered <br />the department's ability to be enabling, and if the City maintained that direction he doubted the <br />department would be able to implement at least six of the recommendations. Ms. Bettman <br />suggested that the department could easily evaluate the cost of implementing many of the <br />operational recommendations. Those predicated on policy changes could be noted, and that <br />could be part of the report. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman determined that Mr. Zucker looked at the extent to whether a policy was in ordinance <br />form and the extent to which the community clearly understood the policy. For example, he had <br />looked at the City's policies on growth and economic development, as well as all the process <br />materials. He had attempted to understand, for example, what somebody who wanted to add a <br />bedroom to their house went through: What was handed to them by City staff? How long did they <br />wait for service? Did they find out where they needed to go? Could they find where they needed <br />to go? Ms. Bettman said she was sorry to hear Mr. Zucker's answer because she had hoped for <br />something different. She thought the intent of the audit was to look at staffing needs and <br />turnaround times. She cited the American Heritage Dictionary definition of "audit," which was "an <br />examination of records or accounts to check their accuracy." Ms. Bettman likened the report to <br />the recent Business Climate Survey, which had centered mostly on industry's perceptions. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling found it interesting that some of the comments made by those participating in the focus <br />groups were the same comments the council heard in the Business Climate Survey and at the <br />nodal development hearings, that is, that citizens do not feel involved in the process. He said the <br />City needed to work on that. Mr. Poling noted the recommendation for planners as project <br />managers and recalled discussion among the councilors about that prior to his joining the council. <br />He suggested that cross-training of inspectors would be of great benefit and for more information <br />about the status of that discussion. Mr. Coyle indicated he would provide the council with <br />information on what had been done. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling found the report informative and well-done and hoped the council took its <br />recommendations to heart and implemented as many as possible as quickly as possible. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked if Mr. Coyle supported the recommendations. Mr. Coyle indicated he supported <br />the majority of the recommendations. <br /> <br />Speaking to the policy issue, Mr. Coyle cited Recommendation 55, "Shorten time goals for Type 1 <br />permits and adjustments." He said that the issue of how many applications had been approved in <br />contrast to how many had been denied had been raised several times by the council and Planning <br />Commission. When staff walked away from that discussion, it did not know if the council wanted <br />it to deny more applications, or if it was moving quickly enough. He said that was the policy issue <br />the planners frequently faced. He said the department was trying to be consultative in nature with <br />the goal of getting applications to approval. If the department was in disagreement with the <br />developer, such applications could be discarded early. Mr. Coyle said that if the council wanted <br /> <br /> MINUTES - Eugene City Council June 25, 2003 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.