Laserfiche WebLink
level crimes on campus. This ordinance would authorize the University's Department of Public <br />Safety (DPS) to address these misdemeanors, specifically possession of less than one ounce of <br />marijuana and crimes involving the abuse of alcohol. She recommended the adoption of the <br />ordinance, calling it fiscally responsible to do so. <br /> <br />Council President Pap~ opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Dan Williams, 1167 East 22nd Avenue, introduced himself as the Vice President of <br />Administration of the University of Oregon. He expressed the university's support for the <br />ordinance. He stressed the value and implications of adopting the proposal from the university's <br />point of view. He felt that a natural outcome of the mutually supportive relationship of the EPD <br />and the DPS was the community policing presence in the University neighborhood. He said that <br />the proposed amendment to the ordinance would aid in sharing the resources of the university and <br />the community dedicated to the general health and safety of the community in a way that would <br />be more effective, while strengthening the positive relationship that exists between the EPD and <br />the DPS. He thanked the council for its thoughtful consideration of the request. <br /> <br />Anne Leavitt, 4099 Hilyard, said that she served as Vice President of Student Affairs. She <br />related that the issue had been thoroughly discussed among the student government leaders and <br />the issues that had been raised were addressed. She reported that it was believed the number of <br />citations would not change, that five out of every six citations would continue to go to judicial <br />affairs. She stated that it was hoped the citation process would increase safety for all parties, and <br />be more efficient, effective, and satisfactory as it would not detain either the officer or the student <br />for quite as long. She added that students had been reassured that visitors and members of the <br />campus community would be subject to the same consequences as students were, and that to <br />address the concern that the campus environment could be altered by this change, a public <br />advisory council to the department of public safety had been formed. She averred that the student <br />population had been sufficiently noticed of this change during the latter part of the school year. <br />She advocated for passing the ordinance at this time in order to facilitate officer training in time <br />for the beginning of the new school year in September. <br /> <br />Thomas Hicks, 1881 Holly Avenue, spoke as the interim director for the University of Oregon <br />Department of Safety. He asserted that enabling university officers to enforce certain municipal <br />violations would provide the officers with additional tools to encourage young adults to make <br />responsible choices regarding alcohol and drug use. He felt that this would encourage the <br />efficient use of law enforcement resources. He noted that the amendment would reduce the <br />amount of time a person would be detained because the incident would no longer be required to <br />be first investigated by a University Public Safety officer and then by a Eugene Police Department <br />officer. He stated that the amendment would clarify legal issues surrounding the enforcement of <br />violations, particularly with regard to occurrences in the presence of a public safety officer and <br />would reduce the liability of University Public Safety officers when confiscating contraband such <br />as small amounts of marijuana. He noted that, currently, a response from the Eugene Police <br />Department was required whenever drug paraphernalia or any amount of a controlled substance <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 14, 2003 Page 12 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />