Laserfiche WebLink
2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed Date Time Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />1/4/2017 2/3/2017 29 Performance RP was unhappy for with having to pay a tow fee <br />for a vehicle that she didn't even know was <br />stolen. <br />Lt. found that the car was recovered before RP knew it was stolen <br />and attempts to contact the RP were not successful. The case was <br />forwarded to Risk Services for reimbursement to RP. <br />1/5/2017 1/17/2017 12 Inquiry RP was unhappy that an officer falsely accused <br />him of lighting fires when he had only burned off <br />a kerosene rag. <br />Sgt. found that the officer responded to a call of a man burning <br />particle board and pallets. The officer observed a stack of pallets in <br />the median strip. RP admitted to burning several items. The officer <br />gave RP a warning about reckless burning and did not cite him. No <br />policy violation was found. <br />1/3/2017 1/27/2017 24 Performance RP alleged that at the end of an investigative <br />contact, an officer directed the RP into a room <br />and told the RP that his reactions were <br />concerning to the officer. The RP stated that the <br />officer made him feel scolded, intimidated and <br />uncomfortable. <br />Sgt. investigated and spoke with several witnesses; it was <br />determined that the officer's conduct did not violate policy. <br />1/8/2017 2/6/2017 28 Policy RP was unhappy that officers did not provide a <br />ride home after arresting their friend for DUII. <br />Sgt. explained to RP that EPD did not have the staffing abilities to <br />take an officer off patrol to drive someone home; he also pointed <br />out that the officer had volunteered to call a taxi, but the offer was <br />declined. <br />1/10/2017 1/10/2017 0 Performance <br />Dismissed: <br />Previously <br />reviewed <br />RP reported an incident from Feb 2016 that was <br />reviewed at the time of the incident. <br />Dismissed: Previously Reviewed <br />1/11/2017 1/25/2017 14 Performance RP reported a patrol vehicle that proceeded <br />through a pedestrian crossing when its lights <br />were flashing. <br />Sgt. reviewed the laws pertaining to the crossing light and notified <br />RP that it is legal for vehicles to cross when a pedstrian is not <br />within 6 feet of the lane of travel. RP appreciated the information. <br />1/11/2017 2/21/2017 40 Courtesy RP felt and officer had a resentful and hostile <br />attitude about taking her call for service. <br />Sgt. found that the officer had not felt that he was rude but was <br />only trying to clarify the situation and make sure that RP <br />understood what officer could and could not do for her. Sgt. spoke <br />with RP about his findings. <br />1/16/2017 1/18/2017 2 Performance RP alleged that an officer only stopped him <br />because of his race. <br />Sgt. found that the description of the suspect matched RP. When <br />the Sgt. spoke with RP, RP stated that he had been upset and was <br />experiencing some mental health issues. No policy violations. <br />1/18/2017 3/9/2017 51 Inquiry RP was upset that an officer was calling him on <br />his friend's phone and continued after he was <br />asked to stop. <br />Sgt. learned that the contact was to notify RP that he could be <br />arrested for telephonic harassment if he did not stop making <br />contact with a person with a restraining order. Sgt.'s attempts to <br />contact RP were unsuccessful. <br />Appendix B Page 1 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2