Laserfiche WebLink
2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed Date Time Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />8/16/2017 9/25/2017 39 Policy RP reported a crosswalk entrapment in which the <br />person on the curb made eye contact and <br />abruptly stepped off the curb. RP noted that part <br />of the ordinance states a pedestrian does not <br />have the right away when a vehicle is close <br />enough to create an immediate hazard. <br />Sgt. spoke with RP about why EPD conducts these types of <br />operations. <br />8/18/2017 9/14/2017 26 Service Level RP was unhappy with the response time when <br />he called about a verbal altercation concerning <br />another man's lack of attention to his child in a <br />pool. <br />Supervisor reviewed BWV from the officer and concurred that <br />there was not probable cause to charge the other party in the <br />altercation. Supervisor spoke with RP regarding his findings. <br />8/18/2017 9/22/2017 34 Inquiry RP was unhappy with two encounters he'd had <br />with EPD officers: a stop for which he disputed <br />the justification, and an incident where officers <br />made him sit then yanked him up. <br />Sgt. reviewed ICV and BWV of the stop which noted multiple <br />driving infractions that gave officers a legal reason to conduct a <br />stop. In the second encounter, BWV showed RP sitting in a chair <br />and an officer assisting him non-forcefully to move to anther <br />location. Sgt. spoke with RP about his findings. <br />8/23/2017 10/6/2017 43 Inquiry RP wanted officers to understand that people <br />with Tourette's Syndrome do not have the same <br />filters for controlling speech as others do. <br />Lt. reviewed the information RP provided. <br />8/23/2017 9/22/2017 29 Inquiry RP was unhappy with how an officer handled a <br />incident in which RP was struck in the face by a <br />another man for playing his flute in the park. RP <br />was given a park exclusion. <br />Review of police reports and BWV showed a 3rd party witness who <br />saw RP being the aggressor in the incident; officers had no <br />probable cause to cite the other person. No policy violation was <br />found. RP did not return phone calls. <br />8/24/2017 8/31/2017 7 Performance Internal complaint that a call was not dispatched <br />correctly. <br />Supervisors reviewed the call with involved employee. <br />8/23/2017 9/28/2017 35 Performance RP reported an EPD vehicle speeding and <br />cutting people off. <br />Sgt. learned that officers were attempting to find a wrong way <br />driver at the time of the incident. The officer was reminded to <br />always drive safely and use emergency lights when possible. Sgt. <br />spoke with RP about the situation. <br />8/28/2017 10/2/2017 34 Use of Force RP felt that an officer should not have disarmed <br />him during a stop. <br />Lt. found that the officer had a justifiable reason to stop RP, and <br />that when the officer learned RP had a gun readily accessible, the <br />officer removed the weapon for the duration of the stop. The <br />officer did not violate policy in doing so. RP did not return the Lt.'s <br />calls. <br />Appendix B Page 21 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2