Laserfiche WebLink
FY04 budget. Ms. Hamm responded that they were, but that the AIRS contribution was not in the <br />baseline budget for Fire Services. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly, noting that the recent budget process had been harrowing, asked why the Budget <br />Committee had not been aware of this possible source of working revenue. Chief Tallon <br />responded that the funding was certainly being utilized. It was noted that the temporary station <br />was costing $50,000 per year and that approximately $200,000 was currently being spent on <br />architectural design. Mr. Kelly expressed concern that it would not look good to the media for the <br />Budget Committee to be unaware of a substantial sum of money. <br /> <br />Ms. Hamm pointed out that the negotiation with AIRS had only been completed in June. She <br />added that the remainder had been utilized in the expenses of preparing and maintaining the site. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman agreed with Mr. Kelly regarding the design of the facility. She noted that Police <br />Commission had tried to work at the State level to remove the prohibition on systems <br />development charges (SDCs) for City facilities but it had not been successful in that effort. She <br />felt that, had the City been collecting these, it could fund this project. She questioned the merit of <br />building this station for existing needs and not the future. She noted that the area to be served <br />was only comprised of 6,000 to 7,000 citizens. <br /> <br />Chief Tallon stated that a station located in a neighborhood of 7,000 would also serve a much <br />larger population as staff do not only respond to calls. He clarified that the population of the area <br />was approximately 17,000, but that only 7,000 were actual residents of the City of Eugene. He <br />said that he would bring a risk analysis study to the council in the fall to determine how best to <br />address the future needs of the area. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman objected to using money for infrastructure at a time when there was a funding <br />shortage to staff the station once it was built. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked if the Valley River station was still under-staffed. Chief Tallon responded that the <br />substation in question was staffed only by firefighter cross-trained medics and housed no fire <br />vehicles. Ms. Taylor echoed Ms. Bettman's concern that construction of another facility without <br />staffing existing facilities to their fullest extent might not be the best use of municipal funds. <br /> <br />Chief Tallon responded that a decision to cover the Santa Clara area had been made with City <br />Council support. He said that he brought before the council the proposal to follow through on this <br />plan. He stressed that he was aware that there was still a risk factor in the Valley River area and <br />reiterated that a complete assessment of fire and emergency services needs would be presented <br />to the council in two months. <br /> <br />Mr. Penwell clarified, at Ms. Taylor's request, that the existing houses did not represent much <br />value. He said that, should the houses go out to bid, the likelihood that bids of more than $2,000 <br />or $3,000 would be submitted was slim and the process was costly to the City. He felt that the <br />houses would be better used as part of the city's pool of affordable housing. He further noted that <br />it cost approximately $30,000 to move such a house. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey was pleased that the City had this option to finance the fire substation. He <br />recognized Mr. Kelly's concern regarding the existing moneys that had not been brought forth <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 23, 2003 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />