Laserfiche WebLink
may impose a fee for the review of a claim under <br />section 7 of this 2007 Act in an amount that does not <br />exceed the actual and reasonable cost of the review. <br />(6) The department or the county shall review claims <br />as quickly as possible, consistent with careful review of <br />the claim. The department shall report to the Joint <br />Legislative Audit Committee on or before March 31, <br />2008, concerning the department’s progress and the <br />counties’ progress in completing review of claims under <br />sections 6 and 7 of this 2007 Act. <br />(7) The department’s final order and a county’s final <br />decision on a claim under section 6 or 7 of this 2007 Act <br />must either deny the claim or approve the claim. If the <br />order or decision approves the claim, the order or <br />decision must state the number of home site approvals <br />issued for the property and may contain other terms <br />that are necessary to ensure that the use of the property <br />is lawful. <br />(Claims Relating to Property Within <br />Urban Growth Boundaries) <br />SECTION 9.(1) A claimant that filed a claim under <br />ORS 197.352 on or before the date of adjournment sine <br />die of the 2007 regular session of the Seventy-fourth <br />Legislative Assembly for property located, in whole or <br />in part, within an urban growth boundary may establish <br />one to 10 single-family dwellings on the portion of the <br />property located within the urban growth boundary. <br />(2) The number of single-family dwellings that may be <br />established on the portion of the property located <br />within the urban growth boundary under this section <br />may not exceed the lesser of: <br />(a) The number of single-family dwellings described in <br />a waiver issued by Metro, a city or a county before the <br />effective date of this 2007 Act or, if a waiver was not <br />issued, the number described in the claim filed with <br />Metro, a city or a county; <br />(b) 10, except that if there are existing dwellings on <br />the property, the number of single-family dwellings that <br />may be established is reduced so that the maximum <br />number of dwellings, including existing dwellings <br />located on the property, does not exceed 10; or <br />(c) The number of single-family dwellings the total <br />value of which represents just compensation for the <br />reduction in fair market value caused by the enactment <br />of one or more land use regulations that were the <br />basis for the claim, as set forth in subsection (6) of this <br />section. <br />(3) If the number of single-family dwellings described <br />in a waiver issued by Metro, a city or a county before the <br />effective date of this 2007 Act or, if a waiver was not <br />issued, the number described in the claim filed with <br />Metro, a city or a county is more than 10, the claimant <br />may amend the claim to reduce the number to no more <br />than 10 by filing notice of the amendment with the <br />information required by section 10 of this 2007 Act. <br />(4) If multiple claims were filed for the same property, <br />the number of single-family dwellings that may be <br />established for purposes of subsection (2)(a) of this <br />section is the number in the most recent waiver issued <br />by Metro, a city or a county before the effective date of <br />this 2007 Act or, if a waiver was not issued, the most <br />recent claim filed with Metro, a city or a county, but not <br />more than 10 in any case. <br />(5) To qualify for the relief provided by this section, <br />the claimant must have filed a claim for the property <br />with the city or county in which the property is located. <br />In addition, regardless of whether a waiver was issued <br />by Metro, a city or a county before the effective date of <br />this 2007 Act, to qualify for relief under this section, <br />the claimant must establish that: <br />(a) The claimant is an owner of the property; <br />(b) All owners of the property have consented in <br />writing to the claim; <br />(c) The property is located, in whole or in part, within <br />an urban growth boundary; <br />(d) On the claimant’s acquisition date, the claimant <br />lawfully was permitted to establish at least the number <br />of dwellings on the property that are authorized under <br />this section; <br />(e) The property is zoned for residential use; <br />(f) One or more land use regulations prohibit <br />establishing the single-family dwellings; <br />(g) The establishment of the single-family dwellings <br />is not prohibited by a land use regulation described in <br />ORS 197.352 (3); <br />(h) The land use regulation described in paragraph (f) <br />of this subsection was enacted after the date the <br />property, or any portion of the property, was brought <br />into the urban growth boundary; <br />(i) If the property is located within the boundaries of <br />Metro, the land use regulation that is the basis for the <br />claim was enacted after the date the property was <br />included within the boundaries of Metro; <br />(j) If the property is located within a city, the land use <br />regulation that is the basis for the claim was enacted <br />after the date the property was annexed to the city; and <br />(k) The enactment of one or more land use <br />regulations, other than land use regulations described <br />in ORS 197.352 (3), that are the basis of the claim <br />caused a reduction in the fair market value of the <br />property, as determined under subsection (6) of this <br />section, that is equal to or greater than the fair market <br />value of the single-family dwellings that may be <br />established on the property under subsection (2) of this <br />section. <br />(6) The reduction in the fair market value of the <br />property caused by the enactment of one or more land <br />use regulations that were the basis for the claim is <br />equal to the decrease, if any, in the fair market value of <br />the property from the date that is one year before the <br />enactment of the land use regulation to the date that is <br />one year after the enactment, plus interest. If the claim <br />is based on the enactment of more than one land use <br />regulation enacted on different dates, the reduction in <br />the fair market value of the property caused by each <br />regulation shall be determined separately and the <br />values added together to calculate the total reduction in <br />fair market value. The reduction in fair market value <br />shall be adjusted by any ad valorem property taxes not <br />paid as a result of any special assessment of the <br />property under ORS 308A.050 to 308A.128, 321.257 to <br />321.390, 321.700 to 321.754 or 321.805 to 321.855, <br />plus interest, offset by any severance taxes paid by the <br />claimant and by any recapture of potential additional <br />tax liability that the claimant has paid or will pay for <br />the property if the property is disqualified from special <br />assessment under ORS 308A.703. Interest shall be <br />computed under this subsection using the average <br />interest rate for a one-year United States Government <br />Treasury Bill on December 31 of each year of the period <br />between the date the land use regulation was enacted <br />and the date the claim was filed, compounded annually <br />on January 1 of each year of the period. <br />Measure 49 <br />Official 2007 November Special Election Voters’ Pamphlet <br />13 | State Measures <br />continued September 24, 2018, Meeting - Item 3