Laserfiche WebLink
•142 condos, town homes, and houses on open space <br />conservation land in Douglas County. <br />The Oregon Division of the Izaak Walton League of <br />America supports Measure 49 because it provides the <br />responsible conservation necessary to sustain healthy <br />wildlife populations for future generations.Measure 49 <br />will protect the habitat that sustains our big game and other <br />wildlife from development into housing tracts, strip malls, and <br />big box stores, while protecting Oregon families’ rights to build <br />a few homes on their land. <br />Please Protect Oregon’s Hunting Heritage by Voting <br />“YES” on Measure 49 <br />(This information furnished by Dawn A. Olson, Oregon Division, Izaak <br />Walton League of America.) <br />This space purchased for $500 in accordance with ORS 251.255. <br />The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by the <br />State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any <br />statement made in the argument. <br />Argument in Favor <br />Union County Farm Bureau asks you to vote yes on <br />Measure 49 <br />Union County Farm Bureau is made up of over 180 farming and <br />ranching families. We are part of Oregon Farm Bureau which <br />has roots back to 1919 and which represents over 8,000 farm <br />and ranch families across Oregon. We’re an organization that <br />works to find positive solutions to the challenges facing family <br />agriculture in Oregon. <br />Measure 49 is a road map to get us past the current conflict. <br />Right now there is conflict and confusion, and seemingly <br />endless court cases over competing interpretations of the law. <br />This kind of uncertainty undermines communities, families, <br />and certainly small businesses as we all plan our futures. <br />Measure 49 brings back some much-needed balance and <br />certainty. The questions under the current situation are as <br />endless as the lawsuits. Measure 49 answers those questions <br />and it resolves other issues that otherwise will likely be battled <br />out in the courts. Measure 49 will help us move past these <br />conflicts and get on with our lives and businesses. <br />Maintaining Oregon’s family farm land is key to the quality of <br />life of all Oregonians. The ground being worked by farm and <br />ranch families across our great state is a major economic driver <br />for our local communities. Family agriculture also fuels jobs in <br />transportation, at our ports, in processing, marketing, and <br />retailing in every corner of Oregon both urban and rural. <br />Family farming provides social benefits and environmental <br />advantages including wildlife habitat. We’re proud of the many <br />contributions we make to the quality of life in Oregon. But <br />ultimately, family agriculture can’t exist without land to farm. <br />Measure 49 helps move us past the conflicts. Please join <br />us in voting yes on Measure 49. <br />(This information furnished by Matt Insko, president, Union County <br />Farm Bureau.) <br />This space purchased for $500 in accordance with ORS 251.255. <br />The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by the <br />State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any <br />statement made in the argument. <br />Argument in Favor <br />NORTHEAST OREGON –ANOTHER COLORADO? <br />Measure 37 was sold as a way for a property owner to build a <br />few homes on their land for their kids or their retirement – if <br />they could do so when they bought it. <br />But Measure 37 has also brought claims for development for <br />enormous housing subdivisions, strip malls and even big-box <br />stores - destroying high-value farm and ranchland, as well as <br />forests, and in areas with severe water problems. <br />Here are a sample of the hundreds of Measure 37 claims <br />for massive development across northeastern Oregon. <br />You can help stop this inappropriate development before it’s <br />too late – by voting YES on Measure 49. <br />Location: Meachum, Umatilla County <br /># of Acres: 14,265 <br />Intent: Subdivision into one-third-acre lots for residential and <br />commercial development <br />Location: Milton-Freewater, Umatilla County <br /># of acres: 18 <br />Current zoning: exclusive farm use <br />Intent: Commercial use by “large retailer” <br />Location: Highway 11, Milton-Freewater, Umatilla County <br /># of acres: 19 <br />Current zoning: exclusive farm use <br />Intent: “Big-box” retail <br />Location: North Powder River Lane, Union County <br /># of acres: 2,482 <br />Current zoning: exclusive farm use <br />Intent: 450-lot subdivision <br />Location: Clear Creek Road, Baker County <br /># of acres: 16,078 <br />Current zoning: exclusive farm use <br />Intent: Unspecified development <br />Location: Lakeshore Drive, Joseph, Wallowa County <br /># of acres: 586 <br />Current zoning: Rural Residential <br />Development Intent: Higher density residential development <br />Location: Wallowa Lake Highway, Joseph, Wallowa County <br /># of acres: 1,600 <br />Intent: Subdivision <br />Claimant: RY Timber Company <br />(Information provided according to most recent data available <br />as of Aug 20, 2007.) <br />(This information furnished by Christine Lewis.) <br />This space purchased for $500 in accordance with ORS 251.255. <br />The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by the <br />State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any <br />statement made in the argument. <br />Argument in Favor <br />Protect Eastern Oregon – Vote Yes on 49 <br />My name is Gary Rhinhart and I live in Pendleton Oregon. <br />I am a fourth generation dryland wheat farmer on lands <br />homesteaded in 1860 by my family. <br />In my service to the Umatilla Basin Watershed Council and <br />Umatilla County Planning Commission, I have listened <br />carefully to many citizens. Many are concerned that Measure 37 <br />was not intended to provide for large developments. I believe <br />the true intension was to permit long time landowners to <br />construct a single-family home on their property. <br />Measure 49 Arguments <br />Official 2007 November Special Election Voters’ Pamphlet <br />34 | State Measures <br />continued September 24, 2018, Meeting - Item 3