Laserfiche WebLink
Argument in Favor <br />Farm families in Clackamas County ask you to vote yes <br />on Measure 49 <br />Sandwiched between a thriving metropolis on the valley floor <br />and the forested slopes of the Cascades, Clackamas County <br />agriculture is a great example of why Oregon needs <br />Measure 49. <br />Clackamas County is an integral part of the Portland metro <br />area and home to about 375,000 Oregonians. Complementing <br />that urban character is a thriving family farm economy. Farm <br />families in our county produce nearly $400 million in sales each <br />year, not including off-farm businesses like transportation, <br />processing, marketing, restaurants, and retail. Blessed with <br />some great soils, Clackamas County is the second most <br />productive agricultural county in Oregon. <br />Clackamas County is a virtual who’s who of beloved Oregon <br />products. Strawberries, Christmas trees, blueberries and <br />blackberries, ornamentals and shade trees, fresh vegetables, <br />hazelnuts, wine, and many more Oregon farm favorites are <br />grown here. Clackamas County is also home to tulip-filled <br />fields, a sea of colors that so beautifully represents Oregon in <br />calendars, posters, and cards. <br />How can Clackamas County be such a family farm success <br />story? The farm answer is that we have the quality land, water, <br />labor, and know-how to be successful. The public policy answer <br />is balance. Oregon needs laws that emphasize balance among <br />different kinds of uses for our irreplaceable land. With balance, <br />family farming can continue to thrive for decades to come, in <br />harmony with flourishing urban areas. <br />Measure 49 brings balance to the heart of our public policy. It <br />allows a reasonable number of homes to be built in farming <br />areas while protecting these areas from runaway development. <br />A lack of balance breeds conflict. Conflict undermines the <br />quality of life enjoyed by all who call this wonderful place <br />home. By bringing balance, Measure 49 will reduce conflicts. <br />We all benefit from that. <br />Clackamas County Farm Bureau has more than 650 farm <br />families working together toward positive solutions. We ask <br />you to join us in voting yes on Measure 49. <br />(This information furnished by Joe Casale, Jr., Clackamas County Farm <br />Bureau.) <br />This space purchased for $500 in accordance with ORS 251.255. <br />The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by the <br />State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any <br />statement made in the argument. <br />Argument in Favor <br />Oregon’s Fire Chiefs Urge You <br />to Vote Yes on Measure 49 <br />It may seem unusual that Oregon Fire Chiefs would weigh in on <br />an issue like Measure 49. After all, what does firefighting have <br />to do with who gets to build what buildings, and where? <br />The answer is: it matters a lot. <br />Our job is to protect the structures, and the people who live and <br />work inside them. That job can be made much more difficult if <br />those structures are not built with fire protection in mind. And <br />even if those homes and businesses are well-built, they can be <br />at risk if they are built in the wrong places. <br />That is what is happening with Measure 37. And Measure 49 <br />will help fix it. <br />Many Measure 37 claims are for massive housing subdivisions <br />on remote farm and forestland that are not appropriate from a <br />fire protection standpoint. <br />•They are isolated from fire stations and other services. <br />•They are often in places at risk for wildfires. <br />•These areas have limited water supplies, and housing <br />developments could drain them even further. It’s very hard <br />to put out a fire without enough water. <br />It would be very difficult, and in some cases perhaps <br />impossible, to provide adequate fire protection for the <br />kinds of large development Measure 37’s loopholes are <br />now allowing.And to the extent that we can, it will be very <br />expensive – an expense that will be born by local property <br />taxpayers. <br />Measure 49 will protect the rights of landowners to build a few <br />houses on their land, if the law allowed them to when they <br />bought it. But it will also help us protect you, by preventing the <br />wrong kind of development in the wrong kinds of places. <br />Roy Hari <br />Fire Chief - retired, Marion County Fire District 1 <br />Larry D. Eckhardt <br />Retired Fire Chief, Sheridan Oregon <br />(This information furnished by Liz Kaufman, Yes on 49 Campaign.) <br />This space purchased for $500 in accordance with ORS 251.255. <br />The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsement by the <br />State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any <br />statement made in the argument. <br />Measure 49 Arguments <br />Official 2007 November Special Election Voters’ Pamphlet <br />46 | State Measures <br />continued September 24, 2018, Meeting - Item 3