Laserfiche WebLink
5. ACTION: An Ordinance Concerning Multiple-Unit Housing; and Amending Section 2.945 <br /> of the Eugene Code, 1971 <br /> <br /> Council President Pap~ moved, seconded by Councilor Nathanson, that the <br /> City Council adopt Council Bill 4844, an ordinance concerning multiple unit <br /> housing tax exemptions. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman supported the motion. She stressed that a critical mass of housing was needed <br />to support the downtown area. She opined that incentives needed to be surgically targeted and <br />that this project fulfilled this objective. She said that this tax exemption would encourage home <br />ownership, noting some people had felt that the proposed housing would be too expensive. She <br />remarked, to that end, the council had supported low-income housing and would continue to <br />support a diversity of development. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman averred that the project slated to be built would set an example for other <br />developers and would encourage them to follow suit in the downtown area. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner echoed Councilor Bettman's sentiments. He asserted that the "surgically <br />applied" ordinance would promote a variety of housing types in the downtown area. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson foresaw more of these ordinances coming before the council. She called it <br />an "important tool"for revitalizing neighborhoods that needed help. She noted that this was <br />especially true, considering the report from the West University Neighborhood Task Force. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor registered her opposition to the motion. She commented that, if this was <br />surgery, it was in the "wrong place and for the wrong people." While she did not object to high- <br />end housing being built in the downtown area, she felt that the people who would be purchasing <br />the condominiums in question could afford to pay their property taxes. She likened it to <br />providing tax perks to rich people. She stressed that low-income people were sometimes faced <br />with the specter of possible loss of housing due to the expense of property taxes. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling cited page 227 of the agenda item summary in which it stated that the Multi- <br />Unit Property Tax Exemption (MUPTE) only exempted the improvements from taxation for a <br />period often years, and not the value of the underlying land. He stressed that the people who <br />were buying the condominiums were not completely exempt from property taxes and that, <br />following the ten-year period, they would be paying taxes on a much appreciated property, due to <br />the improvements. He called it a win-win situation. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for the vote. <br /> <br /> Role call vote; the motion passed 7:1; Councilor Taylor voting in opposition. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 28, 2003 Page 12 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />