Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. McVey confirmed, in response to Councilor Pap~, that there were some benefits in the <br />current SDCs for nodal development. He stated that the proposed modifications in the resolution <br />simply exempted certain developments from qualifying for the reduction. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson expressed concern that there might not be time to adequately discuss the <br />issue. She felt that, perhaps, the issue should be tabled to allow the new councilors more time to <br />review the materials. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asserted that there was no central downtown or central geographic component <br />that was revenue-neutral. She said that, should there not be a geographic adjustment and should <br />the reduction be provided to the downtown core, it would mean that there would be less revenue <br />collected in SDCs. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for the vote on the amendment. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion to amend failed, 5:3; councilors Solomon, Pap~, <br /> and Nathanson voting in favor. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the vote on the main motion was a 4:4 tie; councilors Taylor, <br /> Bettman, Kelly, and Meisner voting in favor; councilors Poling, Nathanson, <br /> Pap~, and Solomon voting in opposition. Mayor Torrey voted against the <br /> motion, and it failed on a final vote of 5:4. <br /> <br />Agenda Item 10 was deferred, due to time constraints. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 10:02 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Dennis Taylor <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Ruth Atcherson) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 28, 2003 Page 19 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />