Laserfiche WebLink
that issue was postponed the worse the situation would get. He said that if the legislature did not <br />meet the challenge, it would continue to lose credibility among the voters. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor indicated that Mr. Heuser would prepare a report on the recent session and <br />would be available to answer questions. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ asked that the report include recommendations for improvements to the committee <br />process as well as a discussion of what went well. <br /> <br />C. Work Session: Disposition of Westmoreland School Property <br /> <br />The council was joined for the item by Public Works Director Kurt Corey and Planning and <br />Development Director Tom Coyle. Mr. Corey reminded the council that the 4J School District <br />was closing several schools and disposing of several existing school sites as surplus property, <br />including the Westmoreland School. He said that during the summer, staff provided the council <br />with information about those sites, and that information was included in the Agenda Item <br />Summary. Mr. Corey called the council's attention to a map showing the Eugene parks service <br />areas and school service areas. He noted that Barb Bellamy and John Lauch from 4J School <br />District were also available to answer questions. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman believed that the issue went beyond the immediate site and touched on the subject of <br />the 4J sites, in addition to other infill opportunities in the urban core, as they related to the City's <br />growth management policies, which called for higher densities. She said that the district intended <br />to sell part of the site to the City to landbank for high-density low-income development. She <br />assumed that 4J would use the residual and rezone it for higher-density housing or mixed use and <br />then sell it, so at some point the entire site would be developed for high densities. As that <br />occurred, the neighborhood would be burdened with such things as congestion and an amenity in <br />the form of the open space created by the school use would be lost. She agreed the City should <br />densify and do infill development, but contended that initially, the City had considered design <br />standards and amenities that enhanced those higher densities to ensure such developments were <br />community enhancements. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman suggested that the City convert part of the property into a neighborhood park to <br />serve the area south of 18th Avenue, or consider developing a pocket park as a compromise with <br />the district, wherein both parties donated a half-acre of each parcel. She said that residents of <br />high-density developments, particularly children, needed a place to recreate. She maintained that <br />children living in the high-density developments would be attracted to the inadequate sidewalks <br />and the street, potentially leading to an accident. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly wanted to ensure the council gave clear direction to staff. He believed that the subject <br />before the council was related to how the community did infill development to achieve higher <br />densities and satisfy other community goals related to transportation and employment. He said <br />the surplus school sites presented the council with potentially the largest infill projects it would <br />see. If that occurred, the development should be done right to demonstrate that it could be done. <br />He looked to Mr. Coyle for specific ideas on how that could be accomplished. He noted that <br />Growth Management Policy 9 discussed the need to mitigate the impact of high-density and infill <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 8, 2003 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />