My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 09/08/03 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2003
>
CC Minutes - 09/08/03 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:31:13 AM
Creation date
7/8/2005 1:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/8/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vided the second. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly asserted that the draft ordinance would not be completed by September 22. He said he <br />hoped that the council would provide final direction for such a draft on the 22nd and not plan on approving <br />it at that time. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman opined that the record should remain open for two weeks as the community has "a lot of <br />passion around this issue." She asked Mr. Coyle to state where further testimony could be submitted. <br />Mayor Torrey called for a vote on the motion on the table. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0; Councilor Nathanson was ex- <br /> cused. <br /> <br />Mr. Coyle provided the following address for further testimony: <br /> Steven A. Nystrom <br /> Planning and Development Department <br /> 99 West l0th Avenue <br /> Eugene, OR 97401 <br /> steven, a.nystrom~ci, eugene, or.us <br /> 682-8385 <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 called the ordinance an indicator of the need to be more proactive and less reactive. He felt <br />that a medical or hospital overlay zone should have already been put into place. He thought that municipal <br />government should be more forward-thinking when addressing community needs. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 commented that he was "troubled" by the recommendation from the Planning Commission. <br />He questioned, in particular, the process recommendation contained in Attachment D, which had not <br />passed the muster of a vote. <br /> <br />Mr. Rusch responded, on behalf of the Planning Commission, that commissioners had spent much time on <br />this, but not enough time. He related that the commission had acknowledged that the siting area would be <br />restricted and that this could present difficulties for a medical entity and, as a result, had suggested that a <br />negotiating committee be included in the procedure for hospital location. He said this was considered a <br />critical component and, though there had not been time to vote on the recommendation, it had been decided <br />to include it in the commission's report nonetheless. <br /> <br />Councilor Papd advised staff to ensure that the Planning Commission voted on such things in the future. <br />He felt it integral to the process to understand whether something presented before the council had been <br />given unanimous or marginal support. He stressed that an item presented before the council needed more <br />than a "kumbaya" done around it. As such, he asserted that the Planning Commission recommendation <br />was incomplete. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly thanked all those who testified, calling it high-quality testimony. He reiterated that the <br />most important objective was the location of a viable hospital in the City of Eugene. He speculated that, at <br />most, the City would consider two potential sitings based on the certificates of need likely to exist in this <br />metro area. He suggested the committee be called a facilitation committee and that it sit with the two <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 8, 2003 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.