Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Bettman pointed out that the City could provide some up-front incentives to a hospital <br />located 2-1/2 miles from the center because it would save the City money in the long-term if the <br />City did not have to provide new infrastructure and services to a new hospital. <br /> <br />Speaking to the mayor's concerns, Ms. Bettman assured the mayor that the resolution was not <br />exclusive, but rather inclusive. She offered to share information she had on the topic with Mayor <br />Torrey. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly agreed with Ms. Bettman's remarks. He said that the resolution did not preclude <br />PeaceHealth from taking advantage of the incentives. If PeaceHealth should choose to provide a <br />facility at the Hilyard campus or anywhere in the geographic boundaries that included emergency <br />care, ICU, and in-patient beds, it would be eligible for the same incentives. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />C. WORK SESSION: Surface Transportation Program - Urban Fund Allocation <br /> <br />City Engineer Mark Schoening was present for the item. He noted that Paul Thompson and Tom <br />Schwetz of the Lane Council of Governments (LCOG) were also present to answer any technical <br />questions the council had on the federal Surface Transportation Program allocations or the <br />process and criteria established and adopted by the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC). He <br />referred to the Agenda Item Summary, which included a review of the allocation process, and <br />noted the allocations to the City of Eugene recommended by the Transportation Planning <br />Committee (TPC) in three project categories: modernization, preservation, and planning and <br />project development. The MPC approved the list of allocations for public review; an open house <br />was scheduled for September 25, and the MPC would take action on the fund allocation and <br />metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program at its October 9 meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Schoening reported that the project list was drawn from the City's Capital Improvement <br />Program, capital budgeting process, and TransPlan. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to direct the City <br /> Manager and City Transportation Planning Committee <br /> representatives to work with LCOG and the MPC to modify the <br /> STP-U programming and evaluation criteria in order to enable <br /> jurisdictions to facilitate and prioritize the funding of operations, <br /> maintenance, and preservation of the road system, if they so <br /> choose. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman spoke in support of the motion. She said that it would allow the council to modify <br />the programming criteria so it could spend the money on the City's maintenance and preservation <br />backlog. She said that the criteria was only recently approved by the MPC, and she had only <br />agreed to the 20 percent allocation to modernization because she had asked if the City could use <br />the money for maintenance and preservation, and the answer had been yes. The project list <br />subsequently presented by staff had included projects that created new capacity. She was told <br />that the projects were picked because they scored highly against the criteria, not because they <br />were a high priority for the City. She wanted to review and revise the criteria again so that <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 24, 2003 Page 10 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />