Laserfiche WebLink
vote, 6:0. <br /> <br />4. PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area <br /> General Plan Diagram and the Willakenzie Area Plan Diagram and Text; Amending the <br /> Eugene Zoning Map and the Eugene Overlay Zone map; Amending Sections 9.2741, 9.4280 <br /> and 9.9700 of the Eugene Code, 1971; Adopting a Severability Clause; and Providing an Effec- <br /> tive Date (City Files: MA 03-1, RA 03-2, CA 03-2, and Z 03-3) <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing and asked councilors to disclose any conflicts of interest, ex parte <br />contacts and biases, abstentions or challenges to impartiality pursuant to Eugene Code 9.7056. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey pointed out that he had engaged in "passing conversations" regarding the issues before the <br />council. City Attorney Glenn Klein responded that this did not create an issue. <br /> <br />City Manager Dennis Taylor introduced the new Planning Director, Susan Muir. He welcomed her to the <br />City. <br /> <br />Mr. Taylor asked Teresa Bishow, senior planner, to present the topic before the council. Ms. Bishow <br />explained that before the council was a draft ordinance designed to provide the policy and regulatory <br />framework for a proposed Mixed-Use development known as Crescent Village. She felt this to be an <br />important step toward achieving the council goal of creating urban villages throughout Eugene that will <br />foster sustainable community growth and change. She related the Eugene Planning Commission had <br />recommended unanimous approval of the amendment to the Metro Plan, Willakenzie Area Plan, the zoning <br />and overlay zone maps, and the land use code. The commission's recommendation was based on the broad <br />goal of providing the policy framework for the proposed mixed-use project. <br /> <br />Ms. Bishow briefly summarized the approval criteria, noting that an evaluation of the criteria was <br />contained in the Planning Division staff report on page 124 of the council agenda packet. She stressed that <br />all testimony, in order to be considered, must be directed towards the approval criteria, and failure to raise <br />an issue with sufficient specificity to allow the council or parties to respond would preclude appeal on that <br />issue. <br /> <br />Regarding the Planning Commission recommendation, Ms. Bishow said the commission had supported an <br />increase in the mix of uses allowed in the Crescent Avenue node. She explained that currently 27 percent <br />of the land within the node was zoned for high density residential development (HDR), while only three <br />percent was zoned for office or community commercial uses. She stated that the ordinance, if approved, <br />would increase the amount of land available for commercial activity, but would still contain sufficient area <br />for high density housing. The proposed Crescent Village conatins approximately 630 new dwellings. She <br />further stated that the Planning Commission had supported changes in the Willakenzie Area Plan that <br />would allow a mixed-use project including high density housing, but at a level that mitigated traffic. She <br />referenced the table listed on page 89 of the council agenda packet. <br /> <br />Ms. Bishow pointed out the letter of support from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) on <br />page 315 of the council agenda packet. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 13, 2003 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />