My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 10/13/03 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2003
>
CC Minutes - 10/13/03 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:31:55 AM
Creation date
7/8/2005 1:19:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/13/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Hanks stated that the full details of his work were contained in the traffic impact study, excerpted in <br />the council agenda packet. He asserted that it showed, with the land use limitations in place, the proposed <br />project would meet all adopted traffic standards for both the State of Oregon and the City of Eugene. He <br />conveyed the company's belief that the study overstated the traffic impacts the development would <br />generate. He felt that, based on the traffic analysis, the council should vote to approve the ordinance. <br /> <br />Larry E. Reed, 722 Country Club Road, director of planning and development for Arlie and Company, <br />discussed the commercial core of the mixed-use development, located northwest of Shadow View Street and <br />Crescent Avenue. He stated that this would be the core of the nodal development and was planned to be a <br />pedestrian-friendly shopping street. He predicted that residents would walk to work and some may only <br />have to walk down a set of stairs, when residing in a building that was a mix of commercial and residential <br />uses. He projected that residents would utilize the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) to attend events in the <br />downtown area. <br /> <br />Mr. Reed said approximately 26 acres of the site would remain under the current zoning, R-4/C-1 <br />neighborhood commercial, and out of the 30 acres, approximately 9 acres would be mixed use/commercial. <br />This was made up of 4 acres of neighborhood commercial, the current zoning, which allowed for circa <br />60,000 square feet of ground floor retail, plus an additional 5 acres of community commercial (the portion <br />to be rezoned) for the purpose of building a grocery store with a footprint of up to 50,000 square feet. He <br />explained that the above the street level retail would be a mix of offices, estimated to be approximately <br />12,000 feet, as well as approximately 150 residential apartment lofts. <br /> <br />Richard Barbis, 722 Country Club Road, architect for the high-density residential area, indicated the <br />location of the R-4 zone to the north of the commercial area on the map. He explained that one goal of the <br />design was to balance the appropriate housing density so the nodal development would be sensitive to and <br />compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods to the east and to the west as well as creating <br />adequate density to support the retail/commercial center. He said the dwelling unit mix was designed to <br />create purposeful density and promote a neighborhood of a broad range of people. He added that the mix <br />would include both zero lot line townhomes and luxury rowhouses, standard apartments and upscale <br />condominiums with retail below overlooking the park/promenade. He shared drawings of the various <br />facades with those present. He asserted that the residential buildings had been specifically designed to <br />respond to the streets and the pedestrian life and the public rights-of-way to create a sense of place. He <br />discussed the design criteria, including clear and identifiable main entrances from the street, outdoor <br />balconies that overhang streets, exterior facade articulation overhanging building footprints, varied facade <br />and roof designs to create interest and scale, and a sensitivity to building heights and massing in order to <br />transition to the adjacent neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Kate McGee, 1466 Washington Street, landscape architect for the design team, stated that the open space <br />was provided in a manner much like one would find in a small town. She commented that the lawn was to <br />appear to be surrounded by the buildings, in order to create a commons. She felt the key feature of this to <br />be a linear court that connected the shopping core up to a city park projected to be developed to the north of <br />the site. She said the private open space was diverse, noting that the amount of private open space declined <br />as the amount of public open space increased. She described the landscape buffers that would separate the <br />development from neighbors to the east and to the west. She noted the buffers, as well as landscaping <br />around parking lots, served a dual purpose, as the permeable soils would allow for the drainage of parking <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 13, 2003 Page 8 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.