My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 10/22/03 WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2003
>
CC Minutes - 10/22/03 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:32:06 AM
Creation date
7/8/2005 1:20:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/22/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Work Session <br /> McNutt Room-City Hall <br /> <br /> October 22, 2003 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Gary Pap~, Nancy Nathanson, Scott Meisner, David Kelly, Betty Taylor <br /> Bonny Bettman, George Poling, Jennifer Solomon. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />A.WORK SESSION: An Ordinance Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General <br /> Plan Diagram and the Willakenzie Area Plan Diagram and Text; Amending the Eugene Zoning <br /> Map; and the Eugene Overlay Zone Map; Amending Sections 9.2741, 9.4280, and 9.9700 of <br /> the Eugene Code, 1971; Adopting a Severability Clause; and Providing an Effective date (City <br /> Files: MA 03-1, RA 03-2, CA 03-2, and Z 03-3) <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called on Senior Planner Teresa Bishow, to present the ordinance. <br /> <br />Ms. Bishow said staff had responded to questions raised by the council at the public hearing on October 13 <br />in a memorandum dated October 20. She noted there were additional questions from Ms. Bettman and staff <br />responded to them in a memorandum dated October 21. She related that, based on careful review by the <br />City Attorney's office, staff had provided a revised ordinance on October 20 that was primarily intended to <br />clarify the original intent of the ordinance. She affirmed that the revised ordinance had been deemed <br />acceptable by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Public Works Department and Planning <br />Department staffs, and Arlie and Company. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called on the council for comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly thanked all those involved for responding to the questions and for the changes in the ordinance. He <br />requested staff to craft language for an amendment that would add to Policy 15 in the ordinance language <br />directing that some percentage of the development would have two functional floors. <br /> <br />Ms. Bishow requested of the mayor that a majority of the council agree to suggested changes. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner recommended that the council engage in some discussion regarding Mr. Kelly's proposed <br />amendment. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon arrived. <br /> <br />Ms. Bishow estimated that design proposal for the Crescent Village planned unit development (PUD) <br />indicated at least 30 percent of the commercial development would be built with two functional floors. <br />Ms. Bettman thanked staff for prompt answers to her questions. She alleged that the trip caps were %n <br />paper only; "the functional number affecting vehicle trips would be the 329,000 square feet of commercial <br />office space. She asked what distinguished this ordinance and made the proposed a node, rather than <br />another development in line with current development practices. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.