Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Coyle noted, as a point of correction, that Arlie and Company, while before the council for little over a <br />month, had been in process for a year. He clarified that a zone change would have to be accompanied by a <br />plan amendment. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson disagreed that a hospital could be "plopped down" in a residential neighborhood, should the <br />ordinance be approved. She reminded councilors of the language in the ordinance that specified that it <br />would only be permitted to be sited on an arterial street or a major collector. She said, further, because it <br />would be under a CUP it would take additional hearings and the applicant would be required to work with <br />the neighborhood. She opposed the amendment. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman conveyed her support for the amendment. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~, noting the Gheen Irrigation site was in his neighborhood, said he would accept a hospital at this <br />site in order to have a hospital in the community. He reiterated that the CUP process would prevent a <br />hospital from "plopping" into a site in a residential neighborhood. He voiced his opposition to the <br />amendment. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner opposed the amendment. He noted that, while the Gheen Irrigation site was zoned R-1, it was <br />not currently being used in that way. He said there were neighborhoods with many single-family residences <br />that were not zoned R-1. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly expressed concern that the hospital could be sited on 24th Avenue or Agate Street in a residential <br />neighborhood as a result of the ordinance. He asserted these neighborhoods needed to be protected from <br />this. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for the vote. <br /> <br /> The motion to amend failed, 5:3; Ms. Taylor, Ms. Bettman, and Mr. Kelly voting in favor. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson commented that common sense would dictate that a developer not choose to site a hospital <br />on Agate Street, as traffic access was essential to its function. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman reiterated her previously stated concerns. She asserted the ordinance would pave the way for <br />development of a hospital in north Eugene. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ disagreed. He said, while he preferred the hospital to develop south of the river, he acknowledged <br />a hospital of this magnitude would need 20 to 25 acres of property. He asked where in the City such a <br />property would be found without some level of condemnation. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for the vote. <br /> <br /> The motion to adopt Council Bill 4849 passed, 5:3; Mr. Kelly, Ms. Taylor, and Ms. <br /> Bettman voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey adjourned the meeting at 1:28 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 22, 2003 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />