My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 5246
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2018 No. 5215-5257
>
Resolution No. 5246
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2018 4:39:26 PM
Creation date
10/19/2018 4:38:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
10/8/2018
Document_Number
Resolution No. 5246
CMO_Effective_Date
10/8/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit C <br />Planning Director's Findings and Recommendation <br />Annexation Request for Monkey Hero, LLC <br />(City File: A 18-3) <br />Application Submitted: lune 12, 2018 <br />(a) Contiguous to the city limits; or <br />Applicant: Monkey Hero, LLC <br />body ofwater. <br />Property Included in Annexation Rel Tax Lots4300, <br />4400 and 4500 of Assessor's Map 1]-04-2344 <br />Zoning: R-1 Low Density Residential with /UL Urbanlzable <br />land Overlay <br />Location: South side of Filbert Avenue, north of Northwest Expressway <br />Representative: Kathy Thomas <br />Lead City Staff: Nicholas Gloello, Ory of Eugene Planning <br />Division, 541£82-5453 <br />EVALUTATION: <br />Based on the Information provided by the applicant, the Gy has determined that this request complies <br />with Eugene Code(EC)Semon 9.7805Annexati0n -Applicability. As such, It is subject to review and <br />approval In accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through <br />9.7835. The applicable approval 0lterla are presented below In bald typeface with Include and <br />conduslonsfollowmg each. <br />ECELM25(l) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city/ c urban growth boundary and is: <br />(a) Contiguous to the city limits; or <br />(b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other <br />body ofwater. <br />CompliesFindings: <br />The annexation area lswlthlnthe Clq/s urban growth boundary(UGB), and is <br />cnIgnore tothe Cly llmlts, consistent with subsection (a) <br />IT <br />NO <br />TES <br />EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistentwith applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in <br />aapplicable refinement lane. <br />Complies <br />Findings: Several policies from the Metro Plan provide support for this annexation by <br />encouraging compact urban growth to adhleve efficient use of and urban service <br />® <br />E] NO <br />YES <br />provisions within the UGB,Inducing the following ponces from the Growth <br />Management sector (In ltzllctext): <br />Policy B. Land with In the UGB may be convenadfrom urbanlzable to urban only <br />through annexation to a city ween It isfou no that: <br />a. A minim um level of Ary urban facilities an dservlcec can be provided to the <br />area in an orderly and efficient manner. <br />b. There will be a logical area and dm e within which to deliver urban servicer <br />andfacilldec. Conversion of urbanlzable land to urban shall also be <br />consistent with the Metro Plan. (page 11 CA) <br />Po11cy10. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the <br />highest priority. (pay ell C 5). <br />Mon key Hem, uqu 13-5I September 2013 EYE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.