My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 10/27/03 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2003
>
CC Minutes - 10/27/03 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:32:14 AM
Creation date
7/8/2005 1:20:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/27/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Judy Iugram, 450 West 8th Avenue, # 1, noted that she worked as a receptionist in a veterinary clinic. She <br />said she had become aware in recent weeks of an explosion in the population of unwanted cats and kittens. <br />She related that the clinic received several calls per day from people who have had kittens placed on their <br />doorstep or otherwise abandoned. She expressed concern for the cats and also for the wildlife that will <br />suffer as a result of the increase in the population of feral cats. <br /> <br />Bruce Miller, PO 50968, noted he had provided the council with copies of several articles from the <br />University of Oregon student newspaper, The Daily Emerald. He registered his opposition to the <br />placement of the new basketball arena at the Howe Field location. He expressed displeasure at University <br />President David Frohnmayer's support for the site. He felt the location presented transportation issues. He <br />commented that the Catholic student leader also opposed siting the arena there. <br /> <br />John Brown, 1260 Charnelton Street, stated for the record that he was speaking on his own behalf and not <br />as a member of a board, commission, or other organization. He said he had participated in an anti-war <br />march in Eugene with a group that was organized and had resources and that the march had been organized <br />in a way that made the City aware of what had been planned. He remarked that veterans, on the other <br />hand, had to pay for a parade permit in order to march. He felt the treatment of the two groups was not <br />equitable, calling it inappropriate for one group to convey a message accompanied by police protection <br />while the other one could not do so freely. He questioned whether freedom of speech could be exercised <br />had no war veterans fought for it. He noted his support for police protection for the anti-war march, but <br />asked the council to look at it from the perspective of veterans who also have a message to convey and also <br />need police protection, but are required to pay for it. <br /> <br />Arthur Farley, 1669 Fairmount Boulevard, indicated he was before the council to comment on the decision <br />to not adopt an increase in stormwater fees. He expressed disappointment in this decision. He said he <br />scrutinized the minutes of the City Council meetings held on July 16 and August 11 in order to understand <br />the perceived problems with the program. He disagreed with the arguments made against the adoption of <br />the following and raised the following points: while other programs had been cut for funding reasons, the <br />stormwater program provided a service and could be funded with revenue from fees; the program was not <br />over-funded now and, he opined, this argument was irrelevant to the discussion; no real data was provided <br />to support the assertion that the program was inefficiently run, noting the Stream Team volunteers who <br />help to keep costs down; and no fee increase had been implemented in years. Mr. Farley stressed the <br />effectiveness of the program and its popularity with the people in the community. He asserted it was <br />consistent with the adopted growth management policies, the adopted sustainability goals, the adopted <br />annual council goals, and with the adopted Rivers to Ridges program. <br /> <br />In closing, Mr. Farley underscored that the fee would increase by 50 cents to members of the community. <br />He urged the council to reconsider its decision, stating that a little money would go a long way, when <br />looking to the future. <br /> <br />Zachary ¥ishanoff, Villard Street, expressed concern regarding the development of nanotechnology at the <br />Riverfront Research Park in the City of Eugene. He asserted that Urban Renewal Agency funding could be <br />used for such development. He urged councilors to read the information he provided them. He felt the <br />technology could be directed toward developing enhanced athletes and soldiers. He alleged that University <br />of Oregon students were opposed to these sorts of developments and highly recommended a forum be held <br />to provide students the opportunity to speak to this. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 27, 2003 Page 2 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.